Mutualistic interactions have great importance in ecology, with genetic infor-mation that takes shape through interactions within the symbiotic partners and between the partners and the environment. It is known that variation of the host-associated microbiome contributes to buffer adaptation challenges of the host’s physiology when facing varying environmental conditions. In agriculture, pivotal examples are symbiotic nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, known to contribute greatly to host (legume plants) adaptation and host productivity. A holistic view of increasing crop yield and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses is that of microbiome engineering, the exploitation of a host-associated microbiome through its rationally designed manipulation with synthetic microbial commu-nities. However, several studies highlighted that the expression of the desired phenotype in the host resides in species-specific, even genotype-specific in-teractions between the symbiotic partners. Consequently, there is a need to dissect such an intimate level of interaction, aiming to identify the main ge-netic components in both partners playing a role in symbiotic differences/host preferences. In the present paper, while briefly reviewing the knowledge and the challenges in plant–microbe interaction and rhizobial studies, we aim to promote research on genotype x genotype interaction between rhizobia and host plants for a rational design of synthetic symbiotic nitrogen-fixing microbial communities to be used for sustainably improving leguminous plants yield.

Cangioli, L. (2021). Legume tasters: symbiotic rhizobia host preference and smart inoculant formulations. BIOLOGICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 66(1), 47-54 [10.21638/spbu03.2021.106].

Legume tasters: symbiotic rhizobia host preference and smart inoculant formulations

Checcucci A.;
2021

Abstract

Mutualistic interactions have great importance in ecology, with genetic infor-mation that takes shape through interactions within the symbiotic partners and between the partners and the environment. It is known that variation of the host-associated microbiome contributes to buffer adaptation challenges of the host’s physiology when facing varying environmental conditions. In agriculture, pivotal examples are symbiotic nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, known to contribute greatly to host (legume plants) adaptation and host productivity. A holistic view of increasing crop yield and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses is that of microbiome engineering, the exploitation of a host-associated microbiome through its rationally designed manipulation with synthetic microbial commu-nities. However, several studies highlighted that the expression of the desired phenotype in the host resides in species-specific, even genotype-specific in-teractions between the symbiotic partners. Consequently, there is a need to dissect such an intimate level of interaction, aiming to identify the main ge-netic components in both partners playing a role in symbiotic differences/host preferences. In the present paper, while briefly reviewing the knowledge and the challenges in plant–microbe interaction and rhizobial studies, we aim to promote research on genotype x genotype interaction between rhizobia and host plants for a rational design of synthetic symbiotic nitrogen-fixing microbial communities to be used for sustainably improving leguminous plants yield.
2021
Cangioli, L. (2021). Legume tasters: symbiotic rhizobia host preference and smart inoculant formulations. BIOLOGICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 66(1), 47-54 [10.21638/spbu03.2021.106].
Cangioli, L., Checcucci, A., Mengoni, A., Fagorzi, C.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cangioli 2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Altra tipologia di licenza compatibile con Open Access
Dimensione 819.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
819.44 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/818556
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact