This article uses a systematic review of the main literature in the field to shed light on different operationalizations of the main classifications of policy instruments. Although the literature offers a large number of instrument taxonomies, many of them act as theoretical guidelines rather than operational concepts that can help to disentangle the different features of governing actions. This article provides a review of the most frequently used policy instrument typologies and, through a meta-analysis, it analyses how instrument typologies have been differentially adopted to explain real-world phenomena. The results are a high degree of heterogeneity in citation frequency, the polyhedral nature of the concept of policy instruments, a divide between typologies focused on governmental resources and those focused on drivers of expected behaviour, and ‘labellism’. Thus, what emerges is the urgency of a process of convergence towards a common framework.

Policy instruments at work: A meta-analysis of their applications / Acciai C.; Capano G.. - In: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. - ISSN 0033-3298. - STAMPA. - 99:1(2021), pp. 118-136. [10.1111/padm.12673]

Policy instruments at work: A meta-analysis of their applications

Capano G.
2021

Abstract

This article uses a systematic review of the main literature in the field to shed light on different operationalizations of the main classifications of policy instruments. Although the literature offers a large number of instrument taxonomies, many of them act as theoretical guidelines rather than operational concepts that can help to disentangle the different features of governing actions. This article provides a review of the most frequently used policy instrument typologies and, through a meta-analysis, it analyses how instrument typologies have been differentially adopted to explain real-world phenomena. The results are a high degree of heterogeneity in citation frequency, the polyhedral nature of the concept of policy instruments, a divide between typologies focused on governmental resources and those focused on drivers of expected behaviour, and ‘labellism’. Thus, what emerges is the urgency of a process of convergence towards a common framework.
2021
Policy instruments at work: A meta-analysis of their applications / Acciai C.; Capano G.. - In: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. - ISSN 0033-3298. - STAMPA. - 99:1(2021), pp. 118-136. [10.1111/padm.12673]
Acciai C.; Capano G.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/814412
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 44
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact