Academic interest in the relation between populist movements/parties and constitutions, as well as more broadly in the relationship between forms of populism, illiberalism, and authoritarianism, on one hand, and (domestic and international) law and constitutionalism on the other, is rapidly increasing. A significant part of the debate is focussing on how to diagnose, and prevent, so-called ‘backsliding’ and on how to save constitutional democracy. There is, in this, much less engagement with the question of how the populist challenge might equally challenge core dimensions of taken-for-granted notions of constitutionalism and how it might reveal problematic dimensions.

Populism, Constituent Power and Constitutional Imagination

Paul Blokker
2021

Abstract

Academic interest in the relation between populist movements/parties and constitutions, as well as more broadly in the relationship between forms of populism, illiberalism, and authoritarianism, on one hand, and (domestic and international) law and constitutionalism on the other, is rapidly increasing. A significant part of the debate is focussing on how to diagnose, and prevent, so-called ‘backsliding’ and on how to save constitutional democracy. There is, in this, much less engagement with the question of how the populist challenge might equally challenge core dimensions of taken-for-granted notions of constitutionalism and how it might reveal problematic dimensions.
2021
Populist Constitutionalism and Illiberal Democracies
147
170
Paul Blokker
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/810556
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact