BackgroundThe 'jumping to conclusions' (JTC) bias is associated with both psychosis and general cognition but their relationship is unclear. In this study, we set out to clarify the relationship between the JTC bias, IQ, psychosis and polygenic liability to schizophrenia and IQ.MethodsA total of 817 first episode psychosis patients and 1294 population-based controls completed assessments of general intelligence (IQ), and JTC, and provided blood or saliva samples from which we extracted DNA and computed polygenic risk scores for IQ and schizophrenia.ResultsThe estimated proportion of the total effect of case/control differences on JTC mediated by IQ was 79%. Schizophrenia polygenic risk score was non-significantly associated with a higher number of beads drawn (B = 0.47, 95% CI-0.21 to 1.16, p = 0.17); whereas IQ PRS (B = 0.51, 95% CI 0.25-0.76, p < 0.001) significantly predicted the number of beads drawn, and was thus associated with reduced JTC bias. The JTC was more strongly associated with the higher level of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) in controls, including after controlling for IQ (B =-1.7, 95% CI-2.8 to-0.5, p = 0.006), but did not relate to delusions in patients.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the JTC reasoning bias in psychosis might not be a specific cognitive deficit but rather a manifestation or consequence, of general cognitive impairment. Whereas, in the general population, the JTC bias is related to PLEs, independent of IQ. The work has the potential to inform interventions targeting cognitive biases in early psychosis.

Jumping to conclusions, general intelligence, and psychosis liability: Findings from the multi-centre EU-GEI case-control study / Tripoli G.; Quattrone D.; Ferraro L.; Gayer-Anderson C.; Rodriguez V.; La Cascia C.; La Barbera D.; Sartorio C.; Seminerio F.; Tarricone I.; Berardi D.; Szoke A.; Arango C.; Tortelli A.; Llorca P.-M.; De Haan L.; Velthorst E.; Bobes J.; Bernardo M.; Sanjuan J.; Santos J.L.; Arrojo M.; Del-Ben C.M.; Menezes P.R.; Selten J.-P.; Jones P.B.; Jongsma H.E.; Kirkbride J.B.; Lasalvia A.; Tosato S.; Richards A.; O'donovan M.; Rutten B.P.F.; Os J.V.; Morgan C.; Sham P.C.; Murray R.M.; Murray G.K.; Di Forti M.. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 0033-2917. - ELETTRONICO. - 51(4), 623-633:4(2021), pp. 623-633. [10.1017/S003329171900357X]

Jumping to conclusions, general intelligence, and psychosis liability: Findings from the multi-centre EU-GEI case-control study

Tarricone I.;Berardi D.;
2021

Abstract

BackgroundThe 'jumping to conclusions' (JTC) bias is associated with both psychosis and general cognition but their relationship is unclear. In this study, we set out to clarify the relationship between the JTC bias, IQ, psychosis and polygenic liability to schizophrenia and IQ.MethodsA total of 817 first episode psychosis patients and 1294 population-based controls completed assessments of general intelligence (IQ), and JTC, and provided blood or saliva samples from which we extracted DNA and computed polygenic risk scores for IQ and schizophrenia.ResultsThe estimated proportion of the total effect of case/control differences on JTC mediated by IQ was 79%. Schizophrenia polygenic risk score was non-significantly associated with a higher number of beads drawn (B = 0.47, 95% CI-0.21 to 1.16, p = 0.17); whereas IQ PRS (B = 0.51, 95% CI 0.25-0.76, p < 0.001) significantly predicted the number of beads drawn, and was thus associated with reduced JTC bias. The JTC was more strongly associated with the higher level of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) in controls, including after controlling for IQ (B =-1.7, 95% CI-2.8 to-0.5, p = 0.006), but did not relate to delusions in patients.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the JTC reasoning bias in psychosis might not be a specific cognitive deficit but rather a manifestation or consequence, of general cognitive impairment. Whereas, in the general population, the JTC bias is related to PLEs, independent of IQ. The work has the potential to inform interventions targeting cognitive biases in early psychosis.
2021
Jumping to conclusions, general intelligence, and psychosis liability: Findings from the multi-centre EU-GEI case-control study / Tripoli G.; Quattrone D.; Ferraro L.; Gayer-Anderson C.; Rodriguez V.; La Cascia C.; La Barbera D.; Sartorio C.; Seminerio F.; Tarricone I.; Berardi D.; Szoke A.; Arango C.; Tortelli A.; Llorca P.-M.; De Haan L.; Velthorst E.; Bobes J.; Bernardo M.; Sanjuan J.; Santos J.L.; Arrojo M.; Del-Ben C.M.; Menezes P.R.; Selten J.-P.; Jones P.B.; Jongsma H.E.; Kirkbride J.B.; Lasalvia A.; Tosato S.; Richards A.; O'donovan M.; Rutten B.P.F.; Os J.V.; Morgan C.; Sham P.C.; Murray R.M.; Murray G.K.; Di Forti M.. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 0033-2917. - ELETTRONICO. - 51(4), 623-633:4(2021), pp. 623-633. [10.1017/S003329171900357X]
Tripoli G.; Quattrone D.; Ferraro L.; Gayer-Anderson C.; Rodriguez V.; La Cascia C.; La Barbera D.; Sartorio C.; Seminerio F.; Tarricone I.; Berardi D.; Szoke A.; Arango C.; Tortelli A.; Llorca P.-M.; De Haan L.; Velthorst E.; Bobes J.; Bernardo M.; Sanjuan J.; Santos J.L.; Arrojo M.; Del-Ben C.M.; Menezes P.R.; Selten J.-P.; Jones P.B.; Jongsma H.E.; Kirkbride J.B.; Lasalvia A.; Tosato S.; Richards A.; O'donovan M.; Rutten B.P.F.; Os J.V.; Morgan C.; Sham P.C.; Murray R.M.; Murray G.K.; Di Forti M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jumping-to-conclusions-general-intelligence-and-psychosis-liability-findings-from-the-multi-centre-eu-gei-case-control-study.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: versione dell'editore
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 344.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
344.02 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/810330
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
social impact