The aim of this histologic, single-blind, parallel, randomized clinical trial was to compare vertical bone augmentation grafting with 100% autogenous bone (group AB) vs 50% deproteinized bovine bone matrix (DBBM)/50% autogenous bone (group BOAB) using the Fence Technique in a two-stage implant placement. A biopsy was performed in the regenerated area at implant insertion 6 months after the augmentation surgery. The results reflect a sample size of four patients treated per group. At implant placement, 6 months after grafting, no significant differences were evident in the histomorphometric comparisons, even if the percentage of residual graft was obviously greater in the BOAB group (P = .0314).
Merli M., Mariotti G., Pagliaro U., Mazzoni A., Moscatelli M., Nieri M. (2020). The fence technique: 100% autogenous bone graft vs 50% deproteinized bovine bone matrix and 50% autogenous bone graft. A histologic randomized controlled trial. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 40(2), 181-190 [10.11607/prd.4116].
The fence technique: 100% autogenous bone graft vs 50% deproteinized bovine bone matrix and 50% autogenous bone graft. A histologic randomized controlled trial
Mazzoni A.;
2020
Abstract
The aim of this histologic, single-blind, parallel, randomized clinical trial was to compare vertical bone augmentation grafting with 100% autogenous bone (group AB) vs 50% deproteinized bovine bone matrix (DBBM)/50% autogenous bone (group BOAB) using the Fence Technique in a two-stage implant placement. A biopsy was performed in the regenerated area at implant insertion 6 months after the augmentation surgery. The results reflect a sample size of four patients treated per group. At implant placement, 6 months after grafting, no significant differences were evident in the histomorphometric comparisons, even if the percentage of residual graft was obviously greater in the BOAB group (P = .0314).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
