Background/Aim: To compare the predictive efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk stratification systems in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: One-thousand-nine-hundred-nine patients treated with definitive (1,074), adjuvant (381), and salvage radiotherapy (454) were analysed. Results: Both systems significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-freesurvival, and disease-free-survival, while only the NCCN system correlated with local-control in the definitive radiotherapy group. In the adjuvant setting, both systems failed to predict all outcomes. In the salvage setting, only the NCCN system significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival and disease-free-survival. Conclusion: This analysis confirms the efficacy of both systems in definitive radiotherapy and suggests the utility of the NCCN also in salvage radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma: A comparison of the predictive role of EAU versus NCCN risk stratification systems / Buwenge M.; Deodato F.; Dominsky N.; Ntreta M.; Cilla S.; Siepe G.; Alitto A.R.; Bisello S.; Valentini V.; Macchia G.; Morganti A.G.. - In: ANTICANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 0250-7005. - ELETTRONICO. - 40:8(2020), pp. 4413-4418. [10.21873/anticanres.14446]

Radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma: A comparison of the predictive role of EAU versus NCCN risk stratification systems

Buwenge M.;Morganti A. G.
2020

Abstract

Background/Aim: To compare the predictive efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk stratification systems in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: One-thousand-nine-hundred-nine patients treated with definitive (1,074), adjuvant (381), and salvage radiotherapy (454) were analysed. Results: Both systems significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-freesurvival, and disease-free-survival, while only the NCCN system correlated with local-control in the definitive radiotherapy group. In the adjuvant setting, both systems failed to predict all outcomes. In the salvage setting, only the NCCN system significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival and disease-free-survival. Conclusion: This analysis confirms the efficacy of both systems in definitive radiotherapy and suggests the utility of the NCCN also in salvage radiotherapy.
2020
Radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma: A comparison of the predictive role of EAU versus NCCN risk stratification systems / Buwenge M.; Deodato F.; Dominsky N.; Ntreta M.; Cilla S.; Siepe G.; Alitto A.R.; Bisello S.; Valentini V.; Macchia G.; Morganti A.G.. - In: ANTICANCER RESEARCH. - ISSN 0250-7005. - ELETTRONICO. - 40:8(2020), pp. 4413-4418. [10.21873/anticanres.14446]
Buwenge M.; Deodato F.; Dominsky N.; Ntreta M.; Cilla S.; Siepe G.; Alitto A.R.; Bisello S.; Valentini V.; Macchia G.; Morganti A.G.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/796881
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact