Background/Aim: To compare the predictive efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk stratification systems in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: One-thousand-nine-hundred-nine patients treated with definitive (1,074), adjuvant (381), and salvage radiotherapy (454) were analysed. Results: Both systems significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-freesurvival, and disease-free-survival, while only the NCCN system correlated with local-control in the definitive radiotherapy group. In the adjuvant setting, both systems failed to predict all outcomes. In the salvage setting, only the NCCN system significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival and disease-free-survival. Conclusion: This analysis confirms the efficacy of both systems in definitive radiotherapy and suggests the utility of the NCCN also in salvage radiotherapy.

Buwenge M., Deodato F., Dominsky N., Ntreta M., Cilla S., Siepe G., et al. (2020). Radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma: A comparison of the predictive role of EAU versus NCCN risk stratification systems. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 40(8), 4413-4418 [10.21873/anticanres.14446].

Radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma: A comparison of the predictive role of EAU versus NCCN risk stratification systems

Buwenge M.;Morganti A. G.
2020

Abstract

Background/Aim: To compare the predictive efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk stratification systems in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: One-thousand-nine-hundred-nine patients treated with definitive (1,074), adjuvant (381), and salvage radiotherapy (454) were analysed. Results: Both systems significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-freesurvival, and disease-free-survival, while only the NCCN system correlated with local-control in the definitive radiotherapy group. In the adjuvant setting, both systems failed to predict all outcomes. In the salvage setting, only the NCCN system significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival and disease-free-survival. Conclusion: This analysis confirms the efficacy of both systems in definitive radiotherapy and suggests the utility of the NCCN also in salvage radiotherapy.
2020
Buwenge M., Deodato F., Dominsky N., Ntreta M., Cilla S., Siepe G., et al. (2020). Radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma: A comparison of the predictive role of EAU versus NCCN risk stratification systems. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 40(8), 4413-4418 [10.21873/anticanres.14446].
Buwenge M.; Deodato F.; Dominsky N.; Ntreta M.; Cilla S.; Siepe G.; Alitto A.R.; Bisello S.; Valentini V.; Macchia G.; Morganti A.G.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/796881
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact