Our goal was to assess the interrater agreement (IRA) of photoparoxysmal response (PPR) using the classification proposed by a task force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), and a simplified classification system proposed by our group. In addition, we evaluated IRA of epileptiform discharges (EDs) and the diagnostic significance of the electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities. We used EEG recordings from the European Reference Network (EpiCARE) and Standardized Computer-based Organized Reporting of EEG (SCORE). Six raters independently scored EEG recordings from 30 patients. We calculated the agreement coefficient (AC) for each feature. IRA of PPR using the classification proposed by the ILAE task force was only fair (AC = 0.38). This improved to a moderate agreement by using the simplified classification (AC = 0.56; P =.004). IRA of EDs was almost perfect (AC = 0.98), and IRA of scoring the diagnostic significance was moderate (AC = 0.51). Our results suggest that the simplified classification of the PPR is suitable for implementation in clinical practice.

Beniczky S., Aurlien H., Franceschetti S., Martins da Silva A., Bisulli F., Bentes C., et al. (2020). Interrater agreement of classification of photoparoxysmal electroencephalographic response. EPILEPSIA, 61(9), e124-e128 [10.1111/epi.16655].

Interrater agreement of classification of photoparoxysmal electroencephalographic response

Bisulli F.;Ferri L.;
2020

Abstract

Our goal was to assess the interrater agreement (IRA) of photoparoxysmal response (PPR) using the classification proposed by a task force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), and a simplified classification system proposed by our group. In addition, we evaluated IRA of epileptiform discharges (EDs) and the diagnostic significance of the electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities. We used EEG recordings from the European Reference Network (EpiCARE) and Standardized Computer-based Organized Reporting of EEG (SCORE). Six raters independently scored EEG recordings from 30 patients. We calculated the agreement coefficient (AC) for each feature. IRA of PPR using the classification proposed by the ILAE task force was only fair (AC = 0.38). This improved to a moderate agreement by using the simplified classification (AC = 0.56; P =.004). IRA of EDs was almost perfect (AC = 0.98), and IRA of scoring the diagnostic significance was moderate (AC = 0.51). Our results suggest that the simplified classification of the PPR is suitable for implementation in clinical practice.
2020
Beniczky S., Aurlien H., Franceschetti S., Martins da Silva A., Bisulli F., Bentes C., et al. (2020). Interrater agreement of classification of photoparoxysmal electroencephalographic response. EPILEPSIA, 61(9), e124-e128 [10.1111/epi.16655].
Beniczky S.; Aurlien H.; Franceschetti S.; Martins da Silva A.; Bisulli F.; Bentes C.; Canafoglia L.; Ferri L.; Krysl D.; Rita Peralta A.; Racz A.; Cr...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Epilepsia - 2020 - Beniczky.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione 690.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
690.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Contatta l'autore
Beniczky_2020_AAM.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 306.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
306.5 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/794504
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact