Randomized Pilot Trial of Percutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: One-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection syndrome is significantly associated with a deterioration in the quality of life, and its medical treatment is usually ineffective. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to establish the efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in treating this syndrome. DESIGN: This is a randomized pilot trial with 1-year follow-up. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a specialized colorectal unit of a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and low anterior rectal resection for cancer with low anterior resection syndrome score ≥21 and ileostomy closed at least 18 months earlier were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation plus medical treatment (arm A, n = 6) or medical treatment (arm B, n = 6). Low anterior resection syndrome was assessed using symptom severity and disease-specific quality-of-life scores at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at 1-year follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a clinical response, defined as a reduction of the low anterior resection syndrome score. RESULTS: Only in group A low anterior resection syndrome score, fecal incontinence severity index, and obstructed defecation syndrome score improved significantly with treatment (35.8 ± 2.5 vs 29.0 ± 3.8 (p = 0.03); 36.8 ± 4.3 vs 18.5 ± 8.0 (p = 0.02); 10.3 ± 3.9 vs 8.0 ± 4.9 (p = 0.009)) and changes were observed in all domains of quality-of-life instruments. In both groups the symptom severity and quality-of-life scores at 1-year follow-up did not differ significantly from those recorded at the end of treatment. LIMITATIONS: The study had a small number of patients and it was underpowered to detect the within-group effect. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation could be an effective treatment for low anterior resection syndrome. Additional studies are warranted to investigate clinical effectiveness in low anterior resection syndrome.