In this article we intend to discuss “the house” both as an anthropological catego- ry and as a material reality from a comparative perspective. The study of human dwellings across cultures has always occupied the minds of social scientists. However, it was only a few decades ago that social scientists started to look at “houses” not just as constructions endowed with historical meanings and symbolic values, but also as a distinctive type of social formation. To these concerns we want to add a focus on “houses” as spaces of intimacy.
Aurora Donzelli (2008). Rice intimacies. Reflections on the ‘house’ in Upland Sulawesi and South China. ARCHIV FÜR VÖLKERKUNDE, 57-58, 31-58.
Rice intimacies. Reflections on the ‘house’ in Upland Sulawesi and South China
Aurora DonzelliCo-primo
2008
Abstract
In this article we intend to discuss “the house” both as an anthropological catego- ry and as a material reality from a comparative perspective. The study of human dwellings across cultures has always occupied the minds of social scientists. However, it was only a few decades ago that social scientists started to look at “houses” not just as constructions endowed with historical meanings and symbolic values, but also as a distinctive type of social formation. To these concerns we want to add a focus on “houses” as spaces of intimacy.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.