Jobcenter Krefeled correctly applies Regulation 492/2011 instead of the (exception foreseen in the) Directive, but fails to address the ‘beating constitutional heart’ of the case. This was not a technical necessity. Some thoughts on the case.
Giacomo Di Federico (2020). A few thoughts on the normative and constitutional implications of the ruling in Jobcenter Krefeld. EUROJUS, 7, 248-251.
A few thoughts on the normative and constitutional implications of the ruling in Jobcenter Krefeld
Giacomo Di Federico
2020
Abstract
Jobcenter Krefeled correctly applies Regulation 492/2011 instead of the (exception foreseen in the) Directive, but fails to address the ‘beating constitutional heart’ of the case. This was not a technical necessity. Some thoughts on the case.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
A few thoughts on Jobcenter.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
220.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
220.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
