Jobcenter Krefeled correctly applies Regulation 492/2011 instead of the (exception foreseen in the) Directive, but fails to address the ‘beating constitutional heart’ of the case. This was not a technical necessity. Some thoughts on the case.

Giacomo Di Federico (2020). A few thoughts on the normative and constitutional implications of the ruling in Jobcenter Krefeld. EUROJUS, 7, 248-251.

A few thoughts on the normative and constitutional implications of the ruling in Jobcenter Krefeld

Giacomo Di Federico
2020

Abstract

Jobcenter Krefeled correctly applies Regulation 492/2011 instead of the (exception foreseen in the) Directive, but fails to address the ‘beating constitutional heart’ of the case. This was not a technical necessity. Some thoughts on the case.
2020
Giacomo Di Federico (2020). A few thoughts on the normative and constitutional implications of the ruling in Jobcenter Krefeld. EUROJUS, 7, 248-251.
Giacomo Di Federico
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A few thoughts on Jobcenter.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 220.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
220.53 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/786990
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact