Private international law (PIL) addresses overlaps and conflicts between legal systems by distributing cases between the authorities of such systems (jurisdiction) and establishing what rules these authorities have to apply to each case(choice of law). A modular argumentation tool, Arg-tuProlog, is here presented that enables reasoning with rules and interpretations of multiple legal systems.

Calegari, R., Contissa, G., Pisano, G., Sartor, G., Sartor, G. (2020). Arg-tuProlog: A Modular Logic Argumentation Tool for PIL. Amsterdam : IOS Press [10.3233/FAIA200880].

Arg-tuProlog: A Modular Logic Argumentation Tool for PIL

Calegari, Roberta
Primo
;
Contissa, Giuseppe
Secondo
;
Pisano, Giuseppe
;
Sartor, Giovanni
2020

Abstract

Private international law (PIL) addresses overlaps and conflicts between legal systems by distributing cases between the authorities of such systems (jurisdiction) and establishing what rules these authorities have to apply to each case(choice of law). A modular argumentation tool, Arg-tuProlog, is here presented that enables reasoning with rules and interpretations of multiple legal systems.
2020
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2020: The Thirty-third Annual Conference
265
268
Calegari, R., Contissa, G., Pisano, G., Sartor, G., Sartor, G. (2020). Arg-tuProlog: A Modular Logic Argumentation Tool for PIL. Amsterdam : IOS Press [10.3233/FAIA200880].
Calegari, Roberta; Contissa, Giuseppe; Pisano, Giuseppe; Sartor, Galileo; Sartor, Giovanni
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FAIA-334-FAIA200880.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: versione pdf editoriale
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 260.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
260.96 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/786687
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact