Biomass sorghum has an attitude to re-grow after cutting, which is exploited in forage production. To investigate potential benefits for energy production, two genotypes (B133, fibre sorghum; Trudan Headless (TH), forage sorghum), two harvest schemes (single harvest (SH) at physiological maturity (September); double harvest (DH) at blooming (July) plus October re-growth) and two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated, with a different timing between SH and DH) were cross-tested in Northern Italy. Determinations included: dry biomass yield (DB), plant moisture, water use efficiency (WUE), potential energy output, economic assessments. The two genotypes had a close DB in all harvests, despite morphological differences (TH with shorter plants, several tillers and thinner, more resilient stems). TH had a somewhat higher moisture. DH yielded about 20% more than SH; DH average DB (30 Mg ha-1) was equally split between the two harvests. Irrigation raised DB by 10% in SH; by 20% in DH (irrigated during re-growth). Irrigation always involved decreases in WUE. Energy output (biogas, heat, 2nd-generation ethanol) was uninfluenced by genotype (similar fibre composition) and directly related to DB. In financial terms, irrigation and, to a lesser extent, DH hardly proved affordable in a year with a favourable weather course (wet springtime).

Barbanti L., Monti A., Vecchi A., Venturi G. (2009). Assessing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) biomass potential under different harvrst schemes. s.l : s.n.

Assessing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) biomass potential under different harvrst schemes

BARBANTI, LORENZO;MONTI, ANDREA;VECCHI, ANGELA;VENTURI, GIANPIETRO
2009

Abstract

Biomass sorghum has an attitude to re-grow after cutting, which is exploited in forage production. To investigate potential benefits for energy production, two genotypes (B133, fibre sorghum; Trudan Headless (TH), forage sorghum), two harvest schemes (single harvest (SH) at physiological maturity (September); double harvest (DH) at blooming (July) plus October re-growth) and two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated, with a different timing between SH and DH) were cross-tested in Northern Italy. Determinations included: dry biomass yield (DB), plant moisture, water use efficiency (WUE), potential energy output, economic assessments. The two genotypes had a close DB in all harvests, despite morphological differences (TH with shorter plants, several tillers and thinner, more resilient stems). TH had a somewhat higher moisture. DH yielded about 20% more than SH; DH average DB (30 Mg ha-1) was equally split between the two harvests. Irrigation raised DB by 10% in SH; by 20% in DH (irrigated during re-growth). Irrigation always involved decreases in WUE. Energy output (biogas, heat, 2nd-generation ethanol) was uninfluenced by genotype (similar fibre composition) and directly related to DB. In financial terms, irrigation and, to a lesser extent, DH hardly proved affordable in a year with a favourable weather course (wet springtime).
2009
Proceedings of the 17th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition
196
199
Barbanti L., Monti A., Vecchi A., Venturi G. (2009). Assessing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) biomass potential under different harvrst schemes. s.l : s.n.
Barbanti L.; Monti A.; Vecchi A.; Venturi G.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/78573
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact