When assessing whether a company qualifies as an in-house company, there must be no confusion between rules governing its activities and rules related to its subjective nature. European directives do not require that only public entities may receive in-house awards. Public entities, which are shareholders of in-house companies, exercise a “similar control” only through their ordinary powers as shareholders.
Il lavoro dimostra che la disciplina europea sulle figure soggettive in house providing non determina un mutamento della loro natura giuridica se costituite in base al codice civile, ma semplicemente una conformazione della loro attività sottoposta a maggiori controlli amministrativi
GIUSEPPE CAIA (2020). Le società in house: persone giuridiche private sottoposte a peculiare vigilanza e tutela amministrativa. GIURISPRUDENZA COMMERCIALE, XLVI(3/2020), 456-474.
Le società in house: persone giuridiche private sottoposte a peculiare vigilanza e tutela amministrativa
GIUSEPPE CAIA
2020
Abstract
When assessing whether a company qualifies as an in-house company, there must be no confusion between rules governing its activities and rules related to its subjective nature. European directives do not require that only public entities may receive in-house awards. Public entities, which are shareholders of in-house companies, exercise a “similar control” only through their ordinary powers as shareholders.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2020- G. CAIA - Società in house - Giur. comm n. 3-2020 estratto.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione
300.65 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
300.65 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.