When assessing whether a company qualifies as an in-house company, there must be no confusion between rules governing its activities and rules related to its subjective nature. European directives do not require that only public entities may receive in-house awards. Public entities, which are shareholders of in-house companies, exercise a “similar control” only through their ordinary powers as shareholders.

Il lavoro dimostra che la disciplina europea sulle figure soggettive in house providing non determina un mutamento della loro natura giuridica se costituite in base al codice civile, ma semplicemente una conformazione della loro attività sottoposta a maggiori controlli amministrativi

Le società in house: persone giuridiche private sottoposte a peculiare vigilanza e tutela amministrativa

GIUSEPPE CAIA
2020

Abstract

When assessing whether a company qualifies as an in-house company, there must be no confusion between rules governing its activities and rules related to its subjective nature. European directives do not require that only public entities may receive in-house awards. Public entities, which are shareholders of in-house companies, exercise a “similar control” only through their ordinary powers as shareholders.
2020
GIUSEPPE CAIA
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020- G. CAIA - Società in house - Giur. comm n. 3-2020 estratto.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso riservato
Dimensione 300.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
300.65 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/784572
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact