We propose Connection then Credits (CTC) as a new end-to-end flow control protocol to handle message-dependent deadlocks in networks-on-chip (NoC) for multicore systems-on-chip. CTC is based on the classic end-to-end credit-based flow control protocol but differs from it because it uses a network interface micro-architecture where a single credit counter and a single input data queue are shared among all possible communications. This architectural simplification reduces the area occupation of the network interfaces and increases their design reuse: for instance, the same network interface can be used to connect a core independently of the number of incoming and outgoing communications. CTC, however, requires a handshake preamble to initialize the credit counter in the sender network interface based on the buffering capacity of the receiver network interface. While this necessarily introduces a latency overhead in the transfer of a message, simulationbased experimental results show that the penalty in performance is limited when large messages need to be transferred, thus making CTC a valid solution for particular classes of applications such as video stream processing.
Concer N., Bononi L., Soulie M., Locatelli R., Carloni L.P. (2009). CTC: An end-to-end flow control protocol for multi-core systems-on-chip. PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA : IEEE Press [10.1109/NOCS.2009.5071467].
CTC: An end-to-end flow control protocol for multi-core systems-on-chip
BONONI, LUCIANO;
2009
Abstract
We propose Connection then Credits (CTC) as a new end-to-end flow control protocol to handle message-dependent deadlocks in networks-on-chip (NoC) for multicore systems-on-chip. CTC is based on the classic end-to-end credit-based flow control protocol but differs from it because it uses a network interface micro-architecture where a single credit counter and a single input data queue are shared among all possible communications. This architectural simplification reduces the area occupation of the network interfaces and increases their design reuse: for instance, the same network interface can be used to connect a core independently of the number of incoming and outgoing communications. CTC, however, requires a handshake preamble to initialize the credit counter in the sender network interface based on the buffering capacity of the receiver network interface. While this necessarily introduces a latency overhead in the transfer of a message, simulationbased experimental results show that the penalty in performance is limited when large messages need to be transferred, thus making CTC a valid solution for particular classes of applications such as video stream processing.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.