Strengthening and rehabilitation of existing masonry buildings is a topic that attracts the interest of the scientific community worldwide. Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites have been largely employed for structural rehabilitation of masonry structures due to their ease of installation and their high strength-to-weight ratio, since the end of the previous century. Recently, fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites have become an appealing alternative to traditional FRPs, because they employ an inorganic matrix to embed the fibers, which provides a better vapor compatibility with masonry substrate and better resistance to high temperatures than FRPs. To reduce the cost of carbon and glass fibers, the use of new types of fibers, such as high strength steel cords, has been explored. Steel reinforced polymer (SRP) and steel reinforced grout (SRG) are still moving their first steps in the world of structural rehabilitation, but they have shown potentials to become a suitable alternative to other FRP and FRCM composites, respectively. In this work, SRP and SRG composites are bonded to masonry blocks and tested using a direct single-lap shear test set-up to investigate the debonding phenomenon. Two different types of mortar grout are employed for the SRG. A comparison between SRP and SRG composites is presented in terms of debonding capacity and failure modes.

Santandrea Mattia, Baietti Giulia, Kahangi Shahreza Seyedmohammad, Carloni Christian (2019). A comparison between the bond behavior of SRP and SRG strengthening systems applied to a masonry substrate. Cham : Springer Nature [10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_187].

A comparison between the bond behavior of SRP and SRG strengthening systems applied to a masonry substrate

Santandrea Mattia;Baietti Giulia;Carloni Christian
2019

Abstract

Strengthening and rehabilitation of existing masonry buildings is a topic that attracts the interest of the scientific community worldwide. Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites have been largely employed for structural rehabilitation of masonry structures due to their ease of installation and their high strength-to-weight ratio, since the end of the previous century. Recently, fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites have become an appealing alternative to traditional FRPs, because they employ an inorganic matrix to embed the fibers, which provides a better vapor compatibility with masonry substrate and better resistance to high temperatures than FRPs. To reduce the cost of carbon and glass fibers, the use of new types of fibers, such as high strength steel cords, has been explored. Steel reinforced polymer (SRP) and steel reinforced grout (SRG) are still moving their first steps in the world of structural rehabilitation, but they have shown potentials to become a suitable alternative to other FRP and FRCM composites, respectively. In this work, SRP and SRG composites are bonded to masonry blocks and tested using a direct single-lap shear test set-up to investigate the debonding phenomenon. Two different types of mortar grout are employed for the SRG. A comparison between SRP and SRG composites is presented in terms of debonding capacity and failure modes.
2019
Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions : An Interdisciplinary Approach
1743
1750
Santandrea Mattia, Baietti Giulia, Kahangi Shahreza Seyedmohammad, Carloni Christian (2019). A comparison between the bond behavior of SRP and SRG strengthening systems applied to a masonry substrate. Cham : Springer Nature [10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_187].
Santandrea Mattia; Baietti Giulia; Kahangi Shahreza Seyedmohammad; Carloni Christian
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
POST-PRINT_Santandrea_et_al_Sahc_2018_Revised.pdf

Open Access dal 01/01/2020

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 816.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
816.42 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/743520
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact