The best timing for carotid endarterectomy in patients with stroke is still matter of debate, particularly in case of significant cerebral ischemic lesion or neurological deterioration. The present review and meta-analysis aims to report the best evidence in the outcome of patients submitted to urgent (<48h) or standard elapsing time (<2-week) CEA for stroke and to evaluate the impact of cerebral ischemic lesion size and clinical manifestation in the postoperative outcome.
Titolo: | Is size of infarct or clinical picture that should delay urgent carotid endarterectomy? A meta-analysis |
Autore/i: | Pini, Rodolfo; Faggioli, Gianluca; Vacirca, Andrea; Dieng, Mortalla; Fronterrè, Sara; Gallitto, Enrico; Mascoli, Chiara; Stella, Andrea; Gargiulo, Mauro |
Autore/i Unibo: | |
Anno: | 2020 |
Rivista: | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11120-2 |
Abstract: | The best timing for carotid endarterectomy in patients with stroke is still matter of debate, particularly in case of significant cerebral ischemic lesion or neurological deterioration. The present review and meta-analysis aims to report the best evidence in the outcome of patients submitted to urgent (<48h) or standard elapsing time (<2-week) CEA for stroke and to evaluate the impact of cerebral ischemic lesion size and clinical manifestation in the postoperative outcome. |
Data stato definitivo: | 2020-02-27T09:39:01Z |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.