The best timing for carotid endarterectomy in patients with stroke is still matter of debate, particularly in case of significant cerebral ischemic lesion or neurological deterioration. The present review and meta-analysis aims to report the best evidence in the outcome of patients submitted to urgent (<48h) or standard elapsing time (<2-week) CEA for stroke and to evaluate the impact of cerebral ischemic lesion size and clinical manifestation in the postoperative outcome.
Pini, R., Faggioli, G., Vacirca, A., Dieng, M., Fronterrè, S., Gallitto, E., et al. (2020). Is size of infarct or clinical picture that should delay urgent carotid endarterectomy? A meta-analysis. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 61(2), 143-148 [10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11120-2].
Is size of infarct or clinical picture that should delay urgent carotid endarterectomy? A meta-analysis
Pini, Rodolfo
;Faggioli, Gianluca
;Vacirca, Andrea
;Dieng, Mortalla
;Fronterrè, Sara
;Gallitto, Enrico
;Mascoli, Chiara
;Stella, Andrea
;Gargiulo, Mauro
2020
Abstract
The best timing for carotid endarterectomy in patients with stroke is still matter of debate, particularly in case of significant cerebral ischemic lesion or neurological deterioration. The present review and meta-analysis aims to report the best evidence in the outcome of patients submitted to urgent (<48h) or standard elapsing time (<2-week) CEA for stroke and to evaluate the impact of cerebral ischemic lesion size and clinical manifestation in the postoperative outcome.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
