In 2002–2003, the Italian Association for Neuroimmunology (AINI) ran a program for procedure and method standardization in neuroimmunology. The main purposes of the program were: a) to improve the overall quality of analytical performance and, simultaneously, to reduce costs by resource optimization; b) to establish the bases for clinical guidelines in neurology; c) to promote the formation of laboratory networks and of joint research projects; d) to facilitate the procedures for certification required by governmental/non-governmental agencies. This report summarizes the consensus recommendations of a panel of AINI neuroimmunologists/biochemists involved in the field of cerebrospinal fluid examination. The collection process for said recommendations was guided by ‘‘impact-factored’’ literature and the knowledge of the experts involved. Communication was by email and face-to-face at two dedicated AINI workshops.
D FRANCIOTTA, C AVOLIO, E CAPELLO, F LOLLI, AINI PARTICIPATING MEMBERS M TROJANO, R LEANTE, et al. (2005). Consensus recommendations of the Italian Association for Neuroimmunology for immunochemical cerebrospinal fluid examination. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 237, 5-11.
Consensus recommendations of the Italian Association for Neuroimmunology for immunochemical cerebrospinal fluid examination
A. LUGARESIWriting – Review & Editing
;
2005
Abstract
In 2002–2003, the Italian Association for Neuroimmunology (AINI) ran a program for procedure and method standardization in neuroimmunology. The main purposes of the program were: a) to improve the overall quality of analytical performance and, simultaneously, to reduce costs by resource optimization; b) to establish the bases for clinical guidelines in neurology; c) to promote the formation of laboratory networks and of joint research projects; d) to facilitate the procedures for certification required by governmental/non-governmental agencies. This report summarizes the consensus recommendations of a panel of AINI neuroimmunologists/biochemists involved in the field of cerebrospinal fluid examination. The collection process for said recommendations was guided by ‘‘impact-factored’’ literature and the knowledge of the experts involved. Communication was by email and face-to-face at two dedicated AINI workshops.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


