Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an effective alternative to the transvenous one. Defibrillation efficacy depends on maximum device output and on the optimal device location at device implantation. Hypothesis: We sought to investigate the defibrillation safety margin in real life clinical practice. Methods: We sought to understand what is the efficacy of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) termination at S-ICD implantation using lower energies than the recommended 65 J. Results: Sixty-four consecutive S-ICD recipients underwent VF termination attempts at implantation with energies ranging from 20 to 50 J. Overall, VF termination occurred in 84% of patients with ≤40 J, in 88% with 45 J, and in 100% with 60 J. Intermuscular S-ICD placement was associated with 94% VF termination at ≤40 J. An ejection fraction <35% was associated to higher energy requirement for defibrillation; however, an intermuscular S-ICD placement conferred 90% defibrillation efficacy at 31 ± 5 J in this patients subset. Conclusions: This is a hypothesis-generating observation that prompts a methodologically correct investigation to prove that a 60 J output S-ICD can provide an adequate safety margin to terminate VF in clinical practice. This would enable superior device longevity and/or device downsizing for pediatric/small size patients.
Biffi M., Ziacchi M., Angeletti A., Castelli A., Massaro G., Martignani C., et al. (2019). Successful defibrillation verification in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients by low-energy shocks. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 42(6), 612-617 [10.1002/clc.23184].
Successful defibrillation verification in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients by low-energy shocks
Ziacchi M.;Angeletti A.;Massaro G.;Diemberger I.
2019
Abstract
Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an effective alternative to the transvenous one. Defibrillation efficacy depends on maximum device output and on the optimal device location at device implantation. Hypothesis: We sought to investigate the defibrillation safety margin in real life clinical practice. Methods: We sought to understand what is the efficacy of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) termination at S-ICD implantation using lower energies than the recommended 65 J. Results: Sixty-four consecutive S-ICD recipients underwent VF termination attempts at implantation with energies ranging from 20 to 50 J. Overall, VF termination occurred in 84% of patients with ≤40 J, in 88% with 45 J, and in 100% with 60 J. Intermuscular S-ICD placement was associated with 94% VF termination at ≤40 J. An ejection fraction <35% was associated to higher energy requirement for defibrillation; however, an intermuscular S-ICD placement conferred 90% defibrillation efficacy at 31 ± 5 J in this patients subset. Conclusions: This is a hypothesis-generating observation that prompts a methodologically correct investigation to prove that a 60 J output S-ICD can provide an adequate safety margin to terminate VF in clinical practice. This would enable superior device longevity and/or device downsizing for pediatric/small size patients.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.