This essay deals with modern anarchism trying to underline its generalized critical character toward power as a vocation. In a both historical and theoretical perspective, it presents a retrospective view focused on the Enlightenment with particular regard to three poliedric thinkers: William Godwin, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Mary Wollstonecraft. In conclusion the paper shows their different but overlapping difence of the crucial inverse burden of legitimation between authority and freedom, in favor of freedom.
Marina Lalatta Costerbosa (2019). Sull’anarchismo come teoria critica. TIGOR, XI(2), 9-17.
Sull’anarchismo come teoria critica
Marina Lalatta Costerbosa
2019
Abstract
This essay deals with modern anarchism trying to underline its generalized critical character toward power as a vocation. In a both historical and theoretical perspective, it presents a retrospective view focused on the Enlightenment with particular regard to three poliedric thinkers: William Godwin, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Mary Wollstonecraft. In conclusion the paper shows their different but overlapping difence of the crucial inverse burden of legitimation between authority and freedom, in favor of freedom.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
