This essay deals with modern anarchism trying to underline its generalized critical character toward power as a vocation. In a both historical and theoretical perspective, it presents a retrospective view focused on the Enlightenment with particular regard to three poliedric thinkers: William Godwin, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Mary Wollstonecraft. In conclusion the paper shows their different but overlapping difence of the crucial inverse burden of legitimation between authority and freedom, in favor of freedom.

Sull’anarchismo come teoria critica / Marina Lalatta Costerbosa. - In: TIGOR. - ISSN 2035-584X. - ELETTRONICO. - XI:2(2019), pp. 9-17.

Sull’anarchismo come teoria critica

Marina Lalatta Costerbosa
2019

Abstract

This essay deals with modern anarchism trying to underline its generalized critical character toward power as a vocation. In a both historical and theoretical perspective, it presents a retrospective view focused on the Enlightenment with particular regard to three poliedric thinkers: William Godwin, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Mary Wollstonecraft. In conclusion the paper shows their different but overlapping difence of the crucial inverse burden of legitimation between authority and freedom, in favor of freedom.
2019
Sull’anarchismo come teoria critica / Marina Lalatta Costerbosa. - In: TIGOR. - ISSN 2035-584X. - ELETTRONICO. - XI:2(2019), pp. 9-17.
Marina Lalatta Costerbosa
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/723227
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact