The issue of the motivations behind the decision as to whether or not to join protest actions has been investigated by many scholars. Inparticular, recent studies have considered violations of one’s own moral convictions and identification with the protest group as the mainpredictors of collective actions. The present research will focus on the three orientations to the political system identified by Kelman andHamilton (1989), which consider distinct reasons behind the attachment to the political system and explain the motivations behindsupporting or opposing the institutions. The aim is to examine whether these three orientations have an effect on collective action (throughmoral convictions, politicized identification, anger, and efficacy) considering social protests both against and in favor of the status quo.Specifically, the political orientations should explain why individuals hold a given attitude (positive or negative) towards a policy position,hold it with moral conviction, and decide to join a protest action. The results of three studies confirm the relevance of considering politicalorientations. Depending on the aim of the protest, each political orientation has a distinct effect on collective action.

Promoting or opposing social change: Political orientations, moral convictions and protest intentions

Passini, Stefano
2019

Abstract

The issue of the motivations behind the decision as to whether or not to join protest actions has been investigated by many scholars. Inparticular, recent studies have considered violations of one’s own moral convictions and identification with the protest group as the mainpredictors of collective actions. The present research will focus on the three orientations to the political system identified by Kelman andHamilton (1989), which consider distinct reasons behind the attachment to the political system and explain the motivations behindsupporting or opposing the institutions. The aim is to examine whether these three orientations have an effect on collective action (throughmoral convictions, politicized identification, anger, and efficacy) considering social protests both against and in favor of the status quo.Specifically, the political orientations should explain why individuals hold a given attitude (positive or negative) towards a policy position,hold it with moral conviction, and decide to join a protest action. The results of three studies confirm the relevance of considering politicalorientations. Depending on the aim of the protest, each political orientation has a distinct effect on collective action.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Promoting or Opposing Social Change.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 1.16 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.16 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/717843
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact