BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment is considered a reasonable approach for patients with acute posterior circulation stroke, but it remains uncertain which patients will benefit the most from it. OBJECTIVE: To find independent clinical and angiographic predictors of outcome after endovascular treatment for posterior circulation stroke. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients with acute posterior circulation stroke who underwent endovascular treatment in our comprehensive stroke center from January 2015 to December 2017. Good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin score of 0-3 at 90 days. Intracranial atheromatous disease was established on focal stenosis recorded during endovascular treatment. Associations were sought between a good outcome and clinical and angiographic factors. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to define independent outcome predictors. RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients were included: mean age 70.9 ± 12.1 years, median admission NIHSS score, 16 (IQR: 8-30). On univariate analysis, age (p = 0.01), smoking (p = 0.04), hypertension (p = 0.03), successful reperfusion (p = 0.04), presence of extracranial atherosclerosis (p = 0.02), and absence of atherosclerosis (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with a good outcome. On multivariate analysis, age <70 years (odds ratio = 6.20, 95%CI 1.52-25.47, p = 0.01) and absence of intracranial atherosclerosis (odds ratio = 6.45, 95% CI 1.09-38.24, p = 0.04) were independently associated with a good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment determination of the presence or absence of intracranial atherosclerosis can aid management of posterior circulation stroke patients. The absence of intracranial atherosclerosis may have value as a positive selection criterion for endovascular treatment in future trials. The presence of intracranial atherosclerosis could be used as a selection tool in future studies investigating new treatment protocols for this population.

Predictors of response to endovascular treatment of posterior circulation stroke

Gramegna LL;Molina C;
2019

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment is considered a reasonable approach for patients with acute posterior circulation stroke, but it remains uncertain which patients will benefit the most from it. OBJECTIVE: To find independent clinical and angiographic predictors of outcome after endovascular treatment for posterior circulation stroke. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients with acute posterior circulation stroke who underwent endovascular treatment in our comprehensive stroke center from January 2015 to December 2017. Good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin score of 0-3 at 90 days. Intracranial atheromatous disease was established on focal stenosis recorded during endovascular treatment. Associations were sought between a good outcome and clinical and angiographic factors. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to define independent outcome predictors. RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients were included: mean age 70.9 ± 12.1 years, median admission NIHSS score, 16 (IQR: 8-30). On univariate analysis, age (p = 0.01), smoking (p = 0.04), hypertension (p = 0.03), successful reperfusion (p = 0.04), presence of extracranial atherosclerosis (p = 0.02), and absence of atherosclerosis (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with a good outcome. On multivariate analysis, age <70 years (odds ratio = 6.20, 95%CI 1.52-25.47, p = 0.01) and absence of intracranial atherosclerosis (odds ratio = 6.45, 95% CI 1.09-38.24, p = 0.04) were independently associated with a good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment determination of the presence or absence of intracranial atherosclerosis can aid management of posterior circulation stroke patients. The absence of intracranial atherosclerosis may have value as a positive selection criterion for endovascular treatment in future trials. The presence of intracranial atherosclerosis could be used as a selection tool in future studies investigating new treatment protocols for this population.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Gramegna LL, Requena M, Dinia L, Melendez F, Hernández D, Coscojuela P, Quintana M, Vert C, Rubiera M, Ribò M, Rovira À, Molina C, Tomasello A.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/717066
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact