Previous research has analyzed the effect of migration on fertility, and a number of hypotheses have been developed: namely adaptation, socialization, selection, disruption and interrelation of events. Comparison among stayers in the origin countries, migrants and non-migrants in the destination country is essential to gain better understanding of the effects of migration on fertility. However, this joint comparison has been rarely conducted. We sought to fill this gap and analyze migrants’ fertility in Italy. By merging different data sources for the first time, we were able to compare our target group of migrant women, respectively, born in Albania, Morocco and Ukraine with both Italian non-migrants and stayers in the country of origin. Considering the first three orders of births, multi-process hazard models were estimated in order to provide a more exhaustive and diversified scenario and to test the existing hypotheses. The results show that there is no single model of fertility for migrants in Italy. In addition, some hypotheses provide a better explanation of the fertility behavior than others do. Among women from Morocco, the socialization hypothesis tends to prevail, whereas Albanians’ fertility is mostly explained in terms of adaptation. Disruption emerged as the main mechanism able to explain the fertility of migrants from Ukraine, and a clear interrelation between fertility and migration is apparent for women from Albania and Morocco, but only for the first birth.

Roberto Impicciatore, Giuseppe Gabrielli, Anna Paterno (2020). Migrants’ Fertility in Italy: A Comparison Between Origin and Destination. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POPULATION, 36(4), 799-825 [10.1007/s10680-019-09553-w].

Migrants’ Fertility in Italy: A Comparison Between Origin and Destination

Roberto Impicciatore
;
2020

Abstract

Previous research has analyzed the effect of migration on fertility, and a number of hypotheses have been developed: namely adaptation, socialization, selection, disruption and interrelation of events. Comparison among stayers in the origin countries, migrants and non-migrants in the destination country is essential to gain better understanding of the effects of migration on fertility. However, this joint comparison has been rarely conducted. We sought to fill this gap and analyze migrants’ fertility in Italy. By merging different data sources for the first time, we were able to compare our target group of migrant women, respectively, born in Albania, Morocco and Ukraine with both Italian non-migrants and stayers in the country of origin. Considering the first three orders of births, multi-process hazard models were estimated in order to provide a more exhaustive and diversified scenario and to test the existing hypotheses. The results show that there is no single model of fertility for migrants in Italy. In addition, some hypotheses provide a better explanation of the fertility behavior than others do. Among women from Morocco, the socialization hypothesis tends to prevail, whereas Albanians’ fertility is mostly explained in terms of adaptation. Disruption emerged as the main mechanism able to explain the fertility of migrants from Ukraine, and a clear interrelation between fertility and migration is apparent for women from Albania and Morocco, but only for the first birth.
2020
Roberto Impicciatore, Giuseppe Gabrielli, Anna Paterno (2020). Migrants’ Fertility in Italy: A Comparison Between Origin and Destination. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POPULATION, 36(4), 799-825 [10.1007/s10680-019-09553-w].
Roberto Impicciatore; Giuseppe Gabrielli; Anna Paterno
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MANUSCRIPT_REVGG_RI.pdf

Open Access dal 14/01/2021

Descrizione: AAM
Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 732.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
732.55 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/713216
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact