PURPOSE: To report 5-year outcomes of ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with a central graft thickness intended to be <100 μm. METHODS: This retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series included 354 eyes with endothelial decompensation due to various causes (Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, pseudophakic or aphakic bullous keratopathy, failed previous graft, herpetic endothelitis, or buphthalmos). Donor tissue was prepared using the microkeratome-assisted double-pass technique aiming at a graft thickness <100 μm. The Descemet membrane was stripped under air. The graft was delivered into the anterior chamber using the pull-through technique through a 3.2-mm clear corneal incision using a modified Busin glide. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell loss, graft survival rates, and immunologic rejection rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Follow-up data at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after UT-DSAEK were collected from 214, 172, 147, and 105 eyes, respectively. After excluding eyes with comorbidities, BSCVA better than or equal to  20/20 was recorded in 36.3%, 37.4%, 46.4%, and 53.4% of eyes, respectively, whereas BSCVA better than or equal to 20/40 was documented in 95.5%, 95.3%, 96.0%, and 96.6% of eyes, respectively. The mean endothelial cell loss was 35.4%, 42.3%, 43.3%, and 52.3%; Kaplan-Meier graft survival probability was 99.1%, 96.2%, 94.2%, and 94.2%, and Kaplan-Meier cumulative probability of a rejection episode was 3.4%, 4.3%, 5%, and 6.9% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: UT-DSAEK grafts allow excellent 5-year outcomes, including BSCVA, endothelial cell density, and survival rates comparable with those recorded post-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, but with a higher immunologic rejection rate.

Five-Year Outcomes of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Leon P;Giannaccare G
Data Curation
;
2019

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report 5-year outcomes of ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with a central graft thickness intended to be <100 μm. METHODS: This retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series included 354 eyes with endothelial decompensation due to various causes (Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, pseudophakic or aphakic bullous keratopathy, failed previous graft, herpetic endothelitis, or buphthalmos). Donor tissue was prepared using the microkeratome-assisted double-pass technique aiming at a graft thickness <100 μm. The Descemet membrane was stripped under air. The graft was delivered into the anterior chamber using the pull-through technique through a 3.2-mm clear corneal incision using a modified Busin glide. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell loss, graft survival rates, and immunologic rejection rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Follow-up data at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after UT-DSAEK were collected from 214, 172, 147, and 105 eyes, respectively. After excluding eyes with comorbidities, BSCVA better than or equal to  20/20 was recorded in 36.3%, 37.4%, 46.4%, and 53.4% of eyes, respectively, whereas BSCVA better than or equal to 20/40 was documented in 95.5%, 95.3%, 96.0%, and 96.6% of eyes, respectively. The mean endothelial cell loss was 35.4%, 42.3%, 43.3%, and 52.3%; Kaplan-Meier graft survival probability was 99.1%, 96.2%, 94.2%, and 94.2%, and Kaplan-Meier cumulative probability of a rejection episode was 3.4%, 4.3%, 5%, and 6.9% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: UT-DSAEK grafts allow excellent 5-year outcomes, including BSCVA, endothelial cell density, and survival rates comparable with those recorded post-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, but with a higher immunologic rejection rate.
Madi S, Leon P, Nahum Y, DʼAngelo S, Giannaccare G, Beltz J, Busin M
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/711949
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact