The article seeks to shed light on a peculiar and generally overlooked dimension of China and Rus-sia’s increasingly intimate strategic partnership, through the assessment of their allegedly cooperative ties in the Arctic region. Accordingly, the exploration untangles the rationale of Sino-Russian in-teractions within the ranks of the Arctic Council, the current outlook of their joint efforts in the ex-ploitation of Arctic resources, and the ongoing attempts to shape a shared vision for the infrastruc-tural development of the Northern Sea Route. With the notable exception of energy cooperation in the Russian far north, this case study seems to suggest that the growing embrace between Moscow and Beijing is ultimately rooted in pragmatic, instrumental and largely opportunistic considerations, which stand at odds with the ‘win-win’ rhetoric endorsed on both sides during high-level summits.
Fiori, A., Passeri, A. (2019). Beyond the ‘Win-Win’ Rhetoric: Drivers and Limits of the Si-no-Russian Partnership in the Arctic. INTERDISCIPLINARY POLITICAL STUDIES, 5(2), 443-475 [10.1285/i20398573v5n2p443].
Beyond the ‘Win-Win’ Rhetoric: Drivers and Limits of the Si-no-Russian Partnership in the Arctic
Fiori, Antonio;Passeri, Andrea
2019
Abstract
The article seeks to shed light on a peculiar and generally overlooked dimension of China and Rus-sia’s increasingly intimate strategic partnership, through the assessment of their allegedly cooperative ties in the Arctic region. Accordingly, the exploration untangles the rationale of Sino-Russian in-teractions within the ranks of the Arctic Council, the current outlook of their joint efforts in the ex-ploitation of Arctic resources, and the ongoing attempts to shape a shared vision for the infrastruc-tural development of the Northern Sea Route. With the notable exception of energy cooperation in the Russian far north, this case study seems to suggest that the growing embrace between Moscow and Beijing is ultimately rooted in pragmatic, instrumental and largely opportunistic considerations, which stand at odds with the ‘win-win’ rhetoric endorsed on both sides during high-level summits.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
20403-130457-1-PB.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo (CCBYNCSA)
Dimensione
384.2 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
384.2 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.