Although paraphrasing is the linguistic mechanism underlying many plagiarism cases, little attention has been paid to its analysis in the framework of automatic plagiarism detection. Therefore, state-of-the-art plagiarism detectors find it difficult to detect cases of paraphrase plagiarism. In this article, we analyze the relationship between paraphrasing and plagiarism, paying special attention to which paraphrase phenomena underlie acts of plagiarism and which of them are detected by plagiarism detection systems. With this aim in mind, we created the P4P corpus, a new resource that uses a paraphrase typology to annotate a subset of the PAN-PC-10 corpus for automatic plagiarism detection. The results of the Second International Competition on Plagiarism Detection were analyzed in the light of this annotation. The presented experiments show that (i) more complex paraphrase phenomena and a high density of paraphrase mechanisms make plagiarism detection more difficult, (ii) lexical substitutions are the paraphrase mechanisms used the most when plagiarizing, and (iii) paraphrase mechanisms tend to shorten the plagiarized text. For the first time, the paraphrase mechanisms behind plagiarism have been analyzed, providing critical insights for the improvement of automatic plagiarism detection systems. extcopyright 2013 Association for Computational Linguistics.

Plagiarism Meets Paraphrasing: Insights for the Next Generation in Automatic Plagiarism Detection / Barrón-Cedeño, Alberto and Vila, Marta and Antònia Martí, and Rosso, Paolo. - In: COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS. - ISSN 1530-9312. - ELETTRONICO. - 39:4(2013), pp. 917-947. [10.1162/COLI_a_00153]

Plagiarism Meets Paraphrasing: Insights for the Next Generation in Automatic Plagiarism Detection

Barrón-Cedeño, Alberto;
2013

Abstract

Although paraphrasing is the linguistic mechanism underlying many plagiarism cases, little attention has been paid to its analysis in the framework of automatic plagiarism detection. Therefore, state-of-the-art plagiarism detectors find it difficult to detect cases of paraphrase plagiarism. In this article, we analyze the relationship between paraphrasing and plagiarism, paying special attention to which paraphrase phenomena underlie acts of plagiarism and which of them are detected by plagiarism detection systems. With this aim in mind, we created the P4P corpus, a new resource that uses a paraphrase typology to annotate a subset of the PAN-PC-10 corpus for automatic plagiarism detection. The results of the Second International Competition on Plagiarism Detection were analyzed in the light of this annotation. The presented experiments show that (i) more complex paraphrase phenomena and a high density of paraphrase mechanisms make plagiarism detection more difficult, (ii) lexical substitutions are the paraphrase mechanisms used the most when plagiarizing, and (iii) paraphrase mechanisms tend to shorten the plagiarized text. For the first time, the paraphrase mechanisms behind plagiarism have been analyzed, providing critical insights for the improvement of automatic plagiarism detection systems. extcopyright 2013 Association for Computational Linguistics.
2013
Plagiarism Meets Paraphrasing: Insights for the Next Generation in Automatic Plagiarism Detection / Barrón-Cedeño, Alberto and Vila, Marta and Antònia Martí, and Rosso, Paolo. - In: COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS. - ISSN 1530-9312. - ELETTRONICO. - 39:4(2013), pp. 917-947. [10.1162/COLI_a_00153]
Barrón-Cedeño, Alberto and Vila, Marta and Antònia Martí, and Rosso, Paolo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
coli_a_00153.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 379.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
379.17 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/707696
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 105
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 67
social impact