This article analyzes the issue of secession in comparative constitutional law, through the prism of constitutional jurisprudence. Its main axis is the openness to secession as a political aspiration, and therefore the two fundamental cases are Spain (most open) and Germany (most restrictive). Framed also in the context of Italian and Canadian case law, these cases are used to draw conclusions about the constitutional and political reasons for such different judicial positions.

Tribunales constitucionales y secesión: ¿reivindicación (potencialmente) legítima o violación de un principio básico?

RAGONE SABRINA
2019

Abstract

This article analyzes the issue of secession in comparative constitutional law, through the prism of constitutional jurisprudence. Its main axis is the openness to secession as a political aspiration, and therefore the two fundamental cases are Spain (most open) and Germany (most restrictive). Framed also in the context of Italian and Canadian case law, these cases are used to draw conclusions about the constitutional and political reasons for such different judicial positions.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019_Tribunales y Secesión RECHTD.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 523.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
523.82 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/704221
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact