This article analyzes the issue of secession in comparative constitutional law, through the prism of constitutional jurisprudence. Its main axis is the openness to secession as a political aspiration, and therefore the two fundamental cases are Spain (most open) and Germany (most restrictive). Framed also in the context of Italian and Canadian case law, these cases are used to draw conclusions about the constitutional and political reasons for such different judicial positions.
RAGONE SABRINA (2019). Tribunales constitucionales y secesión: ¿reivindicación (potencialmente) legítima o violación de un principio básico?. RECHTD. REVISTA DE ESTUDOS CONSTITUCIONAIS, HERMENÊUTICA E TEORIA DO DIREITO, 11(2), 169-183 [10.4013/rechtd.2019.112.03].
Tribunales constitucionales y secesión: ¿reivindicación (potencialmente) legítima o violación de un principio básico?
RAGONE SABRINA
2019
Abstract
This article analyzes the issue of secession in comparative constitutional law, through the prism of constitutional jurisprudence. Its main axis is the openness to secession as a political aspiration, and therefore the two fundamental cases are Spain (most open) and Germany (most restrictive). Framed also in the context of Italian and Canadian case law, these cases are used to draw conclusions about the constitutional and political reasons for such different judicial positions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2019_Tribunales y Secesión RECHTD.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
523.82 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
523.82 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.