In 1597, Gaspare Tagliacozzi published a famous two-volume book on "plastic surgery." The reconstructive technique he described was based on grafting skin taken from the arm onto the mutilated parts of the patient's damaged face - especially noses. This paper focuses on techniques of grafting, the "culture of grafting," and the relationships between surgery and plant sciences in the sixteenth century. By describing the fascination with grafting in surgery, natural history, gardening, and agronomy the paper argues that grafting techniques were subject to delicate issues: to what extent it was morally acceptable to deceive the eye with artificial entities? and what was the status of the product of a surgical procedure that challenged the traditional natural/artificial distinction? Finally, this paper shows how in the seventeenth century grafting survived the crisis of Galenism by discussing the role it played in teratology and in controversies on the uses the new mechanistic anatomy.

Nature or artifice? Grafting in early modern surgery and agronomy / Savoia P.. - In: JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE AND ALLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 0022-5045. - STAMPA. - 72:1(2017), pp. 67-86. [10.1093/jhmas/jrw039]

Nature or artifice? Grafting in early modern surgery and agronomy

Savoia P.
2017

Abstract

In 1597, Gaspare Tagliacozzi published a famous two-volume book on "plastic surgery." The reconstructive technique he described was based on grafting skin taken from the arm onto the mutilated parts of the patient's damaged face - especially noses. This paper focuses on techniques of grafting, the "culture of grafting," and the relationships between surgery and plant sciences in the sixteenth century. By describing the fascination with grafting in surgery, natural history, gardening, and agronomy the paper argues that grafting techniques were subject to delicate issues: to what extent it was morally acceptable to deceive the eye with artificial entities? and what was the status of the product of a surgical procedure that challenged the traditional natural/artificial distinction? Finally, this paper shows how in the seventeenth century grafting survived the crisis of Galenism by discussing the role it played in teratology and in controversies on the uses the new mechanistic anatomy.
2017
Nature or artifice? Grafting in early modern surgery and agronomy / Savoia P.. - In: JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE AND ALLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 0022-5045. - STAMPA. - 72:1(2017), pp. 67-86. [10.1093/jhmas/jrw039]
Savoia P.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/702967
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact