This Special Issue aims to explain the transition from the Cold War US-led sys- tem of exclusive bilateral alliances in East Asia (or “hub-and-spokes” system) into a “networked security architecture”, i.e. a network of interwoven bilateral, minilateral and multilateral defence arrangements between the US and its regional allies and partners, and that also partly includes China. Drawing from the English School of International Relations, it challenges dominant Structural Realist expla- nations which interpret such development as a form of external balancing against a revisionist China. By contrast, this Special Issue submits that China’s selective contestation of the US-led hegemonic order in East Asia has sparked a renegotia- tion of such order among regional powers, which has resulted in the restructur- ing of the underlying alliances and defence partnerships into a networked security architecture. Specifically, regional powers have sought to broaden the composi- tion of the US-led hegemonic order in East Asia—by diversifying the range of defence ties between US allies and partners, but also by seeking to include the PRC in it. Thereby, rather than merely balancing the People’s Republic of China, they have sought to channel the trajectory of China’s rise within this hegemonic order through a mixture of resistance and accommodation. This introductory paper develops the theoretical framework and central argument of the Special Issue.

Matteo Dian, Hugo Meijer (2020). Networking hegemony: alliance dynamics in East Asia. INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 57, 131-149 [10.1057/s41311-019-00190-y].

Networking hegemony: alliance dynamics in East Asia

Matteo Dian;
2020

Abstract

This Special Issue aims to explain the transition from the Cold War US-led sys- tem of exclusive bilateral alliances in East Asia (or “hub-and-spokes” system) into a “networked security architecture”, i.e. a network of interwoven bilateral, minilateral and multilateral defence arrangements between the US and its regional allies and partners, and that also partly includes China. Drawing from the English School of International Relations, it challenges dominant Structural Realist expla- nations which interpret such development as a form of external balancing against a revisionist China. By contrast, this Special Issue submits that China’s selective contestation of the US-led hegemonic order in East Asia has sparked a renegotia- tion of such order among regional powers, which has resulted in the restructur- ing of the underlying alliances and defence partnerships into a networked security architecture. Specifically, regional powers have sought to broaden the composi- tion of the US-led hegemonic order in East Asia—by diversifying the range of defence ties between US allies and partners, but also by seeking to include the PRC in it. Thereby, rather than merely balancing the People’s Republic of China, they have sought to channel the trajectory of China’s rise within this hegemonic order through a mixture of resistance and accommodation. This introductory paper develops the theoretical framework and central argument of the Special Issue.
2020
Matteo Dian, Hugo Meijer (2020). Networking hegemony: alliance dynamics in East Asia. INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 57, 131-149 [10.1057/s41311-019-00190-y].
Matteo Dian; Hugo Meijer
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dian_Networking hegemony.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 311.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
311.62 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/702539
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact