Background A higher burden of head and neck cancer has been reported to affect deprived populations. This study assessed the association between socioeconomic status and head and neck cancer, aiming to explore how this association is related to differences of tobacco and alcohol consumption across socioeconomic strata. Methods We conducted a case-control study in São Paulo, Brazil (1998e2006), including 1017 incident cases of oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, and 951 sexand age-matched controls. Education and occupation were distal determinants in the hierarchical approach; cumulative exposure to tobacco and alcohol were proximal risk factors. Outcomes of the hierarchical model were compared with fully adjusted ORs. Results Individuals with lower education (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.61 to 3.19) and those performing manual labour (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.26 to 1.92) had a higher risk of disease. However, 54% of the association with lower education and 45% of the association with manual labour were explained by proximal lifestyle exposures, and socioeconomic status remained significantly associated with disease when adjusted for smoking and alcohol consumption.
Boing, A., Antunes, J., de Carvalho, M., Filho, J., Kowalski, L., Michaluart, P., et al. (2011). How much do smoking and alcohol consumption explain socioeconomic inequalities in head and neck cancer risk?. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 65(8), 709-714 [10.1136/jech.2009.097691].
How much do smoking and alcohol consumption explain socioeconomic inequalities in head and neck cancer risk?
Boffetta, P.;
2011
Abstract
Background A higher burden of head and neck cancer has been reported to affect deprived populations. This study assessed the association between socioeconomic status and head and neck cancer, aiming to explore how this association is related to differences of tobacco and alcohol consumption across socioeconomic strata. Methods We conducted a case-control study in São Paulo, Brazil (1998e2006), including 1017 incident cases of oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, and 951 sexand age-matched controls. Education and occupation were distal determinants in the hierarchical approach; cumulative exposure to tobacco and alcohol were proximal risk factors. Outcomes of the hierarchical model were compared with fully adjusted ORs. Results Individuals with lower education (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.61 to 3.19) and those performing manual labour (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.26 to 1.92) had a higher risk of disease. However, 54% of the association with lower education and 45% of the association with manual labour were explained by proximal lifestyle exposures, and socioeconomic status remained significantly associated with disease when adjusted for smoking and alcohol consumption.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
