This paper is focused on international research-action activities conducted by a team from University of Bologna and on a methodological approach applied to the city, understood as heritage and common good. The premise establishes the Cultural Heritage (CH) as the main field of research-action not intended as a static presence in the city, but as the best result, constantly updated, of the actions of transformation of the city. The cultural model is based on a continuous effort to recognize the city and its transformations as heritage, combining conservation and innovation in a seamless stream and permanently involving not only heritage specialists but also all actors which are involved in urban transformation, with varying degrees of responsibility and awareness. Two cities are considered as references and compared with each other to study and test this approach: Bogotá and Bologna with, respectively, two important historical areas, Carrera Séptima and Zamboni district. The focus is on the role that the cultural heritage, material and immaterial, plays in the current urban landscape and on its potential to be a driver for regeneration in the degraded urban fabric. Both areas have been crucial to the urban development and to the expression of social needs by the population, becoming a symbol of collective identity for better or worse. Since the first half of the last century Bogotá has started an exponential urban growth process triggering wearing dynamics that have compromised the urban architectural heritage preservation of the city and led to progressive historical city center deterioration. Bologna district, on the other hand, hosts the oldest university in the western part of the world and such a strong function in the compact city centre reality caused coexistence and social problems and integration needs among the different users. Through a comparative methodology the two historical realities are studied, one as a typical European city and the other one as a Latin American megalopolis. In this light, the term “street” is not limited to the description of the physical space but is associated with the whole system of connections and influences that they exert on their own area.

CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A DRIVER FOR URBAN REGENERATION: COMPARING TWO PROCESSES

A. Boeri;D. Longo;G. Bortoli
2018

Abstract

This paper is focused on international research-action activities conducted by a team from University of Bologna and on a methodological approach applied to the city, understood as heritage and common good. The premise establishes the Cultural Heritage (CH) as the main field of research-action not intended as a static presence in the city, but as the best result, constantly updated, of the actions of transformation of the city. The cultural model is based on a continuous effort to recognize the city and its transformations as heritage, combining conservation and innovation in a seamless stream and permanently involving not only heritage specialists but also all actors which are involved in urban transformation, with varying degrees of responsibility and awareness. Two cities are considered as references and compared with each other to study and test this approach: Bogotá and Bologna with, respectively, two important historical areas, Carrera Séptima and Zamboni district. The focus is on the role that the cultural heritage, material and immaterial, plays in the current urban landscape and on its potential to be a driver for regeneration in the degraded urban fabric. Both areas have been crucial to the urban development and to the expression of social needs by the population, becoming a symbol of collective identity for better or worse. Since the first half of the last century Bogotá has started an exponential urban growth process triggering wearing dynamics that have compromised the urban architectural heritage preservation of the city and led to progressive historical city center deterioration. Bologna district, on the other hand, hosts the oldest university in the western part of the world and such a strong function in the compact city centre reality caused coexistence and social problems and integration needs among the different users. Through a comparative methodology the two historical realities are studied, one as a typical European city and the other one as a Latin American megalopolis. In this light, the term “street” is not limited to the description of the physical space but is associated with the whole system of connections and influences that they exert on their own area.
2018
Sustainable development and planning X
587
598
A. Boeri; D. Longo; G. Bortoli
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ecology and the Environment_low.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 1.33 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.33 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/678132
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact