Objective: Bipolar II disorder (BP-II) is associated with marked morbidity and mortality. Quetiapine, the treatment with greatest evidence for efficacy in BP-II depression, is associated with metabolic burden. Psychotherapy, a treatment with few side effects, has not been systematically evaluated in BP-II. This study compared psychotherapy plus placebo to psychotherapy plus pharmacotherapy as treatments for BP-II depression. Methods: From 2010 to 2015, unmedicated adults (n = 92) with DSM-IV-TR BP-II depression were randomly assigned to weekly sessions of Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT) plus placebo or IPSRT plus quetiapine and followed for 20 weeks. Results: For primary outcomes, IPSRT + quetiapine yielded significantly faster improvement on 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (F1,115.4 = 3.924, P = .048) and greater improvement on Young Mania Rating Scale (F58.5 = 4.242, P = .044) scores. Both groups, however, improved significantly over time with comparable response rates (≥ 50% reduction in depression scores): 67.4% (62/92) in the entire sample, with no between-group differences. Those randomly assigned to their preferred treatment were 4.5 times more likely to respond (OR = 4.48, 95% CI = 1.20–16.77, P = .026). IPSRT + quetiapine assignment was associated with significantly higher body mass index over time (F67.96 = 6.671, P = .012) and rates of dry mouth (79% v. 58%; χ2 = 4.0, P = .046) and a trend toward more complaints of oversedation (100% vs 92%; χ2 = 3.4, P = .063). Conclusions: IPSRT plus quetiapine resulted in greater symptomatic improvement but also more side effects than IPSRT alone. A subset of participants improved with IPSRT alone, although absence of an inactive comparator limits interpretation of this finding. Receipt of preferred treatment was associated with better outcomes. Harms, benefits, and preferences should be considered when recommending treatments for BP-II depression.
Psychotherapy Alone and Combined With Medication as Treatments for Bipolar II Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial / Swartz, Holly A; Rucci, Paola; Thase, Michael E; Wallace, Meredith; Carretta, Elisa; Celedonia, Karen L; Frank, Ellen. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 0160-6689. - STAMPA. - 79:2(2018), pp. 16m11027.1-16m11027.13. [10.4088/JCP.16m11027]
Psychotherapy Alone and Combined With Medication as Treatments for Bipolar II Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Rucci, PaolaFormal Analysis
;Carretta, ElisaMethodology
;
2018
Abstract
Objective: Bipolar II disorder (BP-II) is associated with marked morbidity and mortality. Quetiapine, the treatment with greatest evidence for efficacy in BP-II depression, is associated with metabolic burden. Psychotherapy, a treatment with few side effects, has not been systematically evaluated in BP-II. This study compared psychotherapy plus placebo to psychotherapy plus pharmacotherapy as treatments for BP-II depression. Methods: From 2010 to 2015, unmedicated adults (n = 92) with DSM-IV-TR BP-II depression were randomly assigned to weekly sessions of Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT) plus placebo or IPSRT plus quetiapine and followed for 20 weeks. Results: For primary outcomes, IPSRT + quetiapine yielded significantly faster improvement on 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (F1,115.4 = 3.924, P = .048) and greater improvement on Young Mania Rating Scale (F58.5 = 4.242, P = .044) scores. Both groups, however, improved significantly over time with comparable response rates (≥ 50% reduction in depression scores): 67.4% (62/92) in the entire sample, with no between-group differences. Those randomly assigned to their preferred treatment were 4.5 times more likely to respond (OR = 4.48, 95% CI = 1.20–16.77, P = .026). IPSRT + quetiapine assignment was associated with significantly higher body mass index over time (F67.96 = 6.671, P = .012) and rates of dry mouth (79% v. 58%; χ2 = 4.0, P = .046) and a trend toward more complaints of oversedation (100% vs 92%; χ2 = 3.4, P = .063). Conclusions: IPSRT plus quetiapine resulted in greater symptomatic improvement but also more side effects than IPSRT alone. A subset of participants improved with IPSRT alone, although absence of an inactive comparator limits interpretation of this finding. Receipt of preferred treatment was associated with better outcomes. Harms, benefits, and preferences should be considered when recommending treatments for BP-II depression.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
