We present a detailed analysis of the radial distribution of light-element multiple populations (LE-MPs) in the massive and dense globular cluster M80, based on a combination of UV and optical Hubble Space Telescope data. Surprisingly, we find that first-generation (FG) stars (FG) are significantly more centrally concentrated than extreme second-generation (SG) stars out to ∼2.5r h from the cluster center. To understand the origin of such peculiar behavior, we used a set of N-body simulations following the long-term dynamical evolution of LE-MPs. We find that, given the advanced dynamical state of the cluster, the observed difference does not depend on the primordial relative distributions of FG and SG stars. On the contrary, a difference of ∼0.05-0.10 M o between the average masses of the two subpopulations is needed to account for the observed radial distributions. We argue that such a mass difference might be the result of the higher He abundance of SG stars (of the order of ΔY ∼0.05-0.06) with respect to FG stars. Interestingly, we find that a similar He variation is necessary to reproduce the horizontal branch morphology of M80. These results demonstrate that differences in mass among LE-MPs, due to different He content, should be properly taken into account for a correct interpretation of their radial distribution, at least in dynamically evolved systems.

Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Vesperini, E., Salaris, M., Ferraro, F., Lanzoni, B., et al. (2018). The Peculiar Radial Distribution of Multiple Populations in the Massive Globular Cluster M80. THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 859(1), 1-12 [10.3847/1538-4357/aabb56].

The Peculiar Radial Distribution of Multiple Populations in the Massive Globular Cluster M80

Cadelano, M.;Ferraro, F. R.
Project Administration
;
Lanzoni, B.;Raso, S.;
2018

Abstract

We present a detailed analysis of the radial distribution of light-element multiple populations (LE-MPs) in the massive and dense globular cluster M80, based on a combination of UV and optical Hubble Space Telescope data. Surprisingly, we find that first-generation (FG) stars (FG) are significantly more centrally concentrated than extreme second-generation (SG) stars out to ∼2.5r h from the cluster center. To understand the origin of such peculiar behavior, we used a set of N-body simulations following the long-term dynamical evolution of LE-MPs. We find that, given the advanced dynamical state of the cluster, the observed difference does not depend on the primordial relative distributions of FG and SG stars. On the contrary, a difference of ∼0.05-0.10 M o between the average masses of the two subpopulations is needed to account for the observed radial distributions. We argue that such a mass difference might be the result of the higher He abundance of SG stars (of the order of ΔY ∼0.05-0.06) with respect to FG stars. Interestingly, we find that a similar He variation is necessary to reproduce the horizontal branch morphology of M80. These results demonstrate that differences in mass among LE-MPs, due to different He content, should be properly taken into account for a correct interpretation of their radial distribution, at least in dynamically evolved systems.
2018
Dalessandro, E., Cadelano, M., Vesperini, E., Salaris, M., Ferraro, F., Lanzoni, B., et al. (2018). The Peculiar Radial Distribution of Multiple Populations in the Massive Globular Cluster M80. THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 859(1), 1-12 [10.3847/1538-4357/aabb56].
Dalessandro, E.; Cadelano, M.; Vesperini, E.; Salaris, M.; Ferraro, F.R.; Lanzoni, B.; Raso, S.; Hong, J.; Webb, J.J.; Zocchi, A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
11585_670308_postprint.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 3.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.47 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/670308
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 39
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact