Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of real-time volume contrast imaging in the A plane (VCI-A) of fetal extremities, compared with conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D). Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial of 100 patients undergoing midtrimester sonography. The fetal limbs were imaged with either 2D or VCI-A with a four-dimensional (4D) electronic probe. Time required for the examination, number of images stored, and quality of the documentation were compared. During the study, 6 fetuses with abnormal extremities were scanned with both 2D and VCI-A, and the diagnostic accuracy and quality of the images were also compared. Results: In the VCI-A group, the fetal extremities were imaged more rapidly (2.3 ± 1.1 vs. 3.3 ± 0.9 min, p < 0.0001), less images were required to document the examination (5.6 ± 1.4 vs. 7.3 ± 1.6), and an optimal documentation was more frequently obtained (84 vs. 54%, p < 0.0001) compared with the 2D group. In malformed fetuses, a precise diagnosis was achieved with both techniques, although images obtained with VCI-A were found to be of superior quality. Conclusions: Real-time VCI-A with a 4D electronic probe is an effective tool for imaging the fetal extremities in midtrimester examinations and carries some advantages over conventional 2D sonography.

Bellussi, F., Simonazzi, G., Salsi, G., Guasina, F., Pilu, G. (2018). Real-Time Volume Contrast Imaging in the A Plane with a Four-Dimensional Electronic Probe Facilitates the Evaluation of Fetal Extremities in Midtrimester Sonograms. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 43(4), 291-296 [10.1159/000477931].

Real-Time Volume Contrast Imaging in the A Plane with a Four-Dimensional Electronic Probe Facilitates the Evaluation of Fetal Extremities in Midtrimester Sonograms

Bellussi, Federica
Investigation
;
Simonazzi, Giuliana
Investigation
;
Salsi, Ginevra
Investigation
;
Guasina, Francesca
Investigation
;
Pilu, Gianluigi
Supervision
2018

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of real-time volume contrast imaging in the A plane (VCI-A) of fetal extremities, compared with conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D). Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial of 100 patients undergoing midtrimester sonography. The fetal limbs were imaged with either 2D or VCI-A with a four-dimensional (4D) electronic probe. Time required for the examination, number of images stored, and quality of the documentation were compared. During the study, 6 fetuses with abnormal extremities were scanned with both 2D and VCI-A, and the diagnostic accuracy and quality of the images were also compared. Results: In the VCI-A group, the fetal extremities were imaged more rapidly (2.3 ± 1.1 vs. 3.3 ± 0.9 min, p < 0.0001), less images were required to document the examination (5.6 ± 1.4 vs. 7.3 ± 1.6), and an optimal documentation was more frequently obtained (84 vs. 54%, p < 0.0001) compared with the 2D group. In malformed fetuses, a precise diagnosis was achieved with both techniques, although images obtained with VCI-A were found to be of superior quality. Conclusions: Real-time VCI-A with a 4D electronic probe is an effective tool for imaging the fetal extremities in midtrimester examinations and carries some advantages over conventional 2D sonography.
2018
Bellussi, F., Simonazzi, G., Salsi, G., Guasina, F., Pilu, G. (2018). Real-Time Volume Contrast Imaging in the A Plane with a Four-Dimensional Electronic Probe Facilitates the Evaluation of Fetal Extremities in Midtrimester Sonograms. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 43(4), 291-296 [10.1159/000477931].
Bellussi, Federica; Simonazzi, Giuliana; Salsi, Ginevra; Guasina, Francesca; Pilu, Gianluigi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/669716
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact