Objective: A recent study suggested that risk of bladder cancer may be higher in women than in men who smoked comparable amounts of cigarettes. We pooled primary data from 14 case-control studies of bladder cancer from Europe and North America and evaluated differences in risk of smoking by gender. Methods: The pooled analysis included 8316 cases (21% women) and 17,406 controls (28% women) aged 30-79 years. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for smoking were adjusted for age and study. Exposure-response was evaluated in a stratified analysis by gender and by generalized additive models. Results: The odds ratios for current smokers compared to nonsmokers were 3.9 (95% CI 3.5-4.3) for males and 3.6 (3.1-4.1) for females. In 11 out of 14 studies, ORs were slightly higher in men. ORs for current smoking were similar for men (OR = 3.4) and women (OR = 3.7) in North America, while in Europe men (OR = 5.3) had higher ORs than women (OR = 3.9). ORs increased with duration and intensity in both genders and the exposure-response patterns were remarkably similar between genders. Conclusion: These results do not support the hypothesis that women have a higher relative risk of smoking-related bladder cancer than men. © Springer-Verlag 2006.

A pooled analysis of bladder cancer case-control studies evaluating smoking in men and women / Puente, D.; Hartge, P.; Greiser, E.; Cantor, K.P.; King, W.D.; González, C.A.; Cordier, S.; Vineis, P.; Lynge, E.; Chang-Claude, J.; Porru, S.; Tzonou, A.; Jöckel, K.-H.; Serra, C.; Hours, M.; Lynch, C.F.; Ranft, U.; Wahrendorf, J.; Silverman, D.; Fernandez, F.; Boffetta, P.; Kogevinas, M.. - In: CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL. - ISSN 0957-5243. - ELETTRONICO. - 17:1(2006), pp. 71-79. [10.1007/s10552-005-0389-0]

A pooled analysis of bladder cancer case-control studies evaluating smoking in men and women

Boffetta, P.;
2006

Abstract

Objective: A recent study suggested that risk of bladder cancer may be higher in women than in men who smoked comparable amounts of cigarettes. We pooled primary data from 14 case-control studies of bladder cancer from Europe and North America and evaluated differences in risk of smoking by gender. Methods: The pooled analysis included 8316 cases (21% women) and 17,406 controls (28% women) aged 30-79 years. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for smoking were adjusted for age and study. Exposure-response was evaluated in a stratified analysis by gender and by generalized additive models. Results: The odds ratios for current smokers compared to nonsmokers were 3.9 (95% CI 3.5-4.3) for males and 3.6 (3.1-4.1) for females. In 11 out of 14 studies, ORs were slightly higher in men. ORs for current smoking were similar for men (OR = 3.4) and women (OR = 3.7) in North America, while in Europe men (OR = 5.3) had higher ORs than women (OR = 3.9). ORs increased with duration and intensity in both genders and the exposure-response patterns were remarkably similar between genders. Conclusion: These results do not support the hypothesis that women have a higher relative risk of smoking-related bladder cancer than men. © Springer-Verlag 2006.
2006
A pooled analysis of bladder cancer case-control studies evaluating smoking in men and women / Puente, D.; Hartge, P.; Greiser, E.; Cantor, K.P.; King, W.D.; González, C.A.; Cordier, S.; Vineis, P.; Lynge, E.; Chang-Claude, J.; Porru, S.; Tzonou, A.; Jöckel, K.-H.; Serra, C.; Hours, M.; Lynch, C.F.; Ranft, U.; Wahrendorf, J.; Silverman, D.; Fernandez, F.; Boffetta, P.; Kogevinas, M.. - In: CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL. - ISSN 0957-5243. - ELETTRONICO. - 17:1(2006), pp. 71-79. [10.1007/s10552-005-0389-0]
Puente, D.; Hartge, P.; Greiser, E.; Cantor, K.P.; King, W.D.; González, C.A.; Cordier, S.; Vineis, P.; Lynge, E.; Chang-Claude, J.; Porru, S.; Tzonou, A.; Jöckel, K.-H.; Serra, C.; Hours, M.; Lynch, C.F.; Ranft, U.; Wahrendorf, J.; Silverman, D.; Fernandez, F.; Boffetta, P.; Kogevinas, M.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/669446
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact