Objectives: To establish clinical consensus on important and relevant quality-of-care (QoC) attributes in ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment that may improve treatment outcomes and guide best practices. Methods: Thirty-eight QoC attributes were identified in a literature review. Sixteen European-based experts were selected based on their contributions to UC guidelines, publications, and patient care. A 3-round, modified Delphi panel was conducted including an interview round, and 2 web-based rounds to reach consensus and finalize a QoC attribute list. Results: The draft QoC attribute list derived from a literature review and Round 1, expert interviews, comprised 63 attributes. In Rounds 2 and 3, the QoC attributes frequently rated as critically important were diagnosis (n = 15, 93.8%), treatment adherence (n = 15, 93.8%), and access to care/treatment (Round 2: n = 14, 87.5%; Round 3: n = 15, 93.8%). The final QoC attribute list consisted of 61 attributes across 20 domains, with the most attributes reported in the "treatment goals" domain (n = 9). Conclusion: QoC is a complex and evolving concept that can improve outcomes while maximizing healthcare resources. Limited time and resources hamper clinicians' ability to openly and empathetically communicate with patients; novel technology may help to offer solutions.

Quality of Care in Ulcerative Colitis: A Modified Delphi Panel Approach / Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent; Baumgart, Daniel C.; Armuzzi, Alessandro; Gionchetti, Paolo; Sebastian, Shaji; Danese, Silvio; Magro, Fernando; Higgins, Sophie; Yaworksy, Andrew; Banderas, Benjamin*; Kachroo, Sumesh. - In: DIGESTIVE DISEASES. - ISSN 0257-2753. - STAMPA. - 36:5(2018), pp. 346-353. [10.1159/000489845]

Quality of Care in Ulcerative Colitis: A Modified Delphi Panel Approach

Gionchetti, Paolo;
2018

Abstract

Objectives: To establish clinical consensus on important and relevant quality-of-care (QoC) attributes in ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment that may improve treatment outcomes and guide best practices. Methods: Thirty-eight QoC attributes were identified in a literature review. Sixteen European-based experts were selected based on their contributions to UC guidelines, publications, and patient care. A 3-round, modified Delphi panel was conducted including an interview round, and 2 web-based rounds to reach consensus and finalize a QoC attribute list. Results: The draft QoC attribute list derived from a literature review and Round 1, expert interviews, comprised 63 attributes. In Rounds 2 and 3, the QoC attributes frequently rated as critically important were diagnosis (n = 15, 93.8%), treatment adherence (n = 15, 93.8%), and access to care/treatment (Round 2: n = 14, 87.5%; Round 3: n = 15, 93.8%). The final QoC attribute list consisted of 61 attributes across 20 domains, with the most attributes reported in the "treatment goals" domain (n = 9). Conclusion: QoC is a complex and evolving concept that can improve outcomes while maximizing healthcare resources. Limited time and resources hamper clinicians' ability to openly and empathetically communicate with patients; novel technology may help to offer solutions.
2018
Quality of Care in Ulcerative Colitis: A Modified Delphi Panel Approach / Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent; Baumgart, Daniel C.; Armuzzi, Alessandro; Gionchetti, Paolo; Sebastian, Shaji; Danese, Silvio; Magro, Fernando; Higgins, Sophie; Yaworksy, Andrew; Banderas, Benjamin*; Kachroo, Sumesh. - In: DIGESTIVE DISEASES. - ISSN 0257-2753. - STAMPA. - 36:5(2018), pp. 346-353. [10.1159/000489845]
Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent; Baumgart, Daniel C.; Armuzzi, Alessandro; Gionchetti, Paolo; Sebastian, Shaji; Danese, Silvio; Magro, Fernando; Higgins, Sophie; Yaworksy, Andrew; Banderas, Benjamin*; Kachroo, Sumesh
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/666383
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact