BACKGROUND AND AIMS: the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer intermediate stage (BCLC-B) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes extremely heterogeneous patients in terms of tumor burden and liver function. Transarterial-chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for these patients although it may be risky/useless for someone, while others could undergo curative treatments. This study assesses the treatment type performed in a large cohort of BCLC-B patients and its outcome. METHODS: retrospective analysis of 485 consecutive BCLC-B patients from the ITA.LI.CA database diagnosed with naïve HCC after 1999. Patients were stratified by treatment. RESULTS: 29 patients (6%) were lost to follow-up before receiving treatment. Treatment distribution was: TACE (233, 51.1%), curative treatments (145 patients, 31.8%), sorafenib (18, 3.9%), other (39, 8.5%), best supportive care (BSC) (21, 4.6%). Median survival (95% CI) was 45 months (37.4-52.7) for curative treatments, 30 (24.7-35.3) for TACE, 14 (10.5-17.5) for sorafenib, 14 (5.2-22.7) for other treatments and 10 (6.0-14.2) for BSC (p<0.0001). Independent prognosticators were sex and treatment. Curative treatments reduced mortality (HR 0.197,95%CI 0.098-0.395) more than TACE (HR 0.408,95%CI 0.211-0.789) (p<0.0001) as compared with BSC. Propensity score matching confirmed the superiority of curative therapies over TACE. CONCLUSIONS: in everyday practice TACE represents the first-line therapy in an half of patients with naïve BCLC-B HCC since treatment choice is driven not only by liver function and nodule characteristics, but also by contraindications to procedures, comorbidities, age and patient opinion. The treatment type is an independent prognostic factor in BCLC-Bpatients and curative options offer the best outcome.

Curative therapies are superior to standard of care (transarterial chemoembolization) for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Pecorelli A;Lenzi B;Gramenzi A;Garuti F;Piscaglia F;Di Marco M;Zoli M;Bernardi M;Trevisani F;Bolondi L;Biselli M;Bucci L;Caraceni P;Cucchetti A;Domenicali M;Venerandi L;Golfieri R;Donatella Magalotti;Carla Serra
2017

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer intermediate stage (BCLC-B) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes extremely heterogeneous patients in terms of tumor burden and liver function. Transarterial-chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for these patients although it may be risky/useless for someone, while others could undergo curative treatments. This study assesses the treatment type performed in a large cohort of BCLC-B patients and its outcome. METHODS: retrospective analysis of 485 consecutive BCLC-B patients from the ITA.LI.CA database diagnosed with naïve HCC after 1999. Patients were stratified by treatment. RESULTS: 29 patients (6%) were lost to follow-up before receiving treatment. Treatment distribution was: TACE (233, 51.1%), curative treatments (145 patients, 31.8%), sorafenib (18, 3.9%), other (39, 8.5%), best supportive care (BSC) (21, 4.6%). Median survival (95% CI) was 45 months (37.4-52.7) for curative treatments, 30 (24.7-35.3) for TACE, 14 (10.5-17.5) for sorafenib, 14 (5.2-22.7) for other treatments and 10 (6.0-14.2) for BSC (p<0.0001). Independent prognosticators were sex and treatment. Curative treatments reduced mortality (HR 0.197,95%CI 0.098-0.395) more than TACE (HR 0.408,95%CI 0.211-0.789) (p<0.0001) as compared with BSC. Propensity score matching confirmed the superiority of curative therapies over TACE. CONCLUSIONS: in everyday practice TACE represents the first-line therapy in an half of patients with naïve BCLC-B HCC since treatment choice is driven not only by liver function and nodule characteristics, but also by contraindications to procedures, comorbidities, age and patient opinion. The treatment type is an independent prognostic factor in BCLC-Bpatients and curative options offer the best outcome.
Pecorelli A, Lenzi B, Gramenzi A, Garuti F, Farinati F, Giannini EG, Ciccarese F, Piscaglia F, Rapaccini GL, Di Marco M, Caturelli E, Zoli M, Borzio F, Sacco R, Cabibbo G, Felder M, Morisco F, Gasbarrini A, Baroni GS, Foschi FG, Biasini E, Masotto A, Virdone R, Bernardi M, Trevisani F; Bolondi L, Biselli M, Bucci L, Caraceni P, Cucchetti A, Domenicali M, Magalotti D, Serra C, Venerandi L, Giacomin A, Maddalo G, Pozzan C, Vani V, Poggio PD, Olmi S, Balsamo C, Vavassori E, Benvegnù L, Cappelli A, Golfieri R, Mosconi C, Renzulli M, Bosco G, Roselli P, Dell'Isola S, Ialungo AM, Bruzzone L, Picciotto A, Marenco S, Risso D, Sammito G, Savarino V, Cammà C, Maida M, Costantino A, Barcellona MR, Affronti A, Mega A, Rinninella E, Mismas V, Cappa FM, Dall'Aglio AC, Feletti V, Lanzi A, Neri E, Stefanini GF, Tamberi S, Missale G, Porro E, Guarino M, Gemini S, Schiadà L
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/664368
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact