One of the aspects that makes difficult grinding processes modelling is the non-deterministic nature of the cutting tool, in particular the abrasive grains of the grinding wheel have a random distribution and an undefined geometry that influences the grinding forces. In order to develop a reliable 3D model of the grinding process the actual microgeometry of abrasive grains must be acquired. This paper compares the results of two different acquisition methods: the geometry acquired via a laser non-contact instrument is confronted with the one acquired using a computer tomography; the accuracy of the grain micro geometry provided by the two approaches is discussed.
Guerrini, G., Fortunato, A., Bruzzone, A., Daddona, D. (2018). Abrasive Grains Micro Geometry: A Comparison between Two Acquisition Methods. Elsevier B.V. [10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.217].
Abrasive Grains Micro Geometry: A Comparison between Two Acquisition Methods
Guerrini, G.;Fortunato, A.
;
2018
Abstract
One of the aspects that makes difficult grinding processes modelling is the non-deterministic nature of the cutting tool, in particular the abrasive grains of the grinding wheel have a random distribution and an undefined geometry that influences the grinding forces. In order to develop a reliable 3D model of the grinding process the actual microgeometry of abrasive grains must be acquired. This paper compares the results of two different acquisition methods: the geometry acquired via a laser non-contact instrument is confronted with the one acquired using a computer tomography; the accuracy of the grain micro geometry provided by the two approaches is discussed.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
