The early modern literary canonisation of Chaucer and the erection of a monument to the poet in Westminster Abbey in 1556 are symptoms of the incipient development of a national English literary canon, whose defining element is the vernacular. Contextualising Chaucer’s memoralisation against the backdrop of two related phenomena – the development of print culture and the post-Reformation religious conflicts – this article aims to shed new light on the complex relation between monumentalisation in stone and in print, delving into the ambivalent ideological implications of Chaucer’s early modern reception. As a result of this critical itinerary, Chaucer will be ultimately discussed as an emblem of canonical resilience at a time when the past had become a contested territory.
Ascari Maurizio (2018). Monumental Chaucer: Print Culture, Conflict, and Canonical Resilience. THE CHAUCER REVIEW, 53(4), 402-427 [10.5325/chaucerrev.53.4.0402].
Monumental Chaucer: Print Culture, Conflict, and Canonical Resilience
Ascari Maurizio
2018
Abstract
The early modern literary canonisation of Chaucer and the erection of a monument to the poet in Westminster Abbey in 1556 are symptoms of the incipient development of a national English literary canon, whose defining element is the vernacular. Contextualising Chaucer’s memoralisation against the backdrop of two related phenomena – the development of print culture and the post-Reformation religious conflicts – this article aims to shed new light on the complex relation between monumentalisation in stone and in print, delving into the ambivalent ideological implications of Chaucer’s early modern reception. As a result of this critical itinerary, Chaucer will be ultimately discussed as an emblem of canonical resilience at a time when the past had become a contested territory.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.