Test reports of building acoustics measurements cannot be considered complete without declaring the associated uncertainty. Two dominant methods exist for calculating the un-certainty, i.e. the empirical approach, standardized in ISO 5725, and the modelling ap-proach, standardized in ISO/IEC Guide 98-3. The state of the art is so that this uncertainty must be assessed using the standard deviation of reproducibility obtained from multiple Inter-Laboratory Tests (ILTs), whose average values are standardized in ISO 12999-1. However, here three standard deviations are given: the usual repeatability and reproduci-bility standard deviations and an additional new standard deviation R95, neither defined nor used before. In the paper, it is shown that R95 causes an over-coverage in the fre-quentist sense, while the natural choice is the reproducibility standard deviation, both for laboratory and field measurements. Moreover, it is remarked that for products for which a specific inter-laboratory test (test code) already exists, a smaller uncertainty can be used, and this may produce an unbalanced situation on the market.

On the uncertainty of sound reduction index measurements from inter-laboratory tests

Garai M.
;
2018

Abstract

Test reports of building acoustics measurements cannot be considered complete without declaring the associated uncertainty. Two dominant methods exist for calculating the un-certainty, i.e. the empirical approach, standardized in ISO 5725, and the modelling ap-proach, standardized in ISO/IEC Guide 98-3. The state of the art is so that this uncertainty must be assessed using the standard deviation of reproducibility obtained from multiple Inter-Laboratory Tests (ILTs), whose average values are standardized in ISO 12999-1. However, here three standard deviations are given: the usual repeatability and reproduci-bility standard deviations and an additional new standard deviation R95, neither defined nor used before. In the paper, it is shown that R95 causes an over-coverage in the fre-quentist sense, while the natural choice is the reproducibility standard deviation, both for laboratory and field measurements. Moreover, it is remarked that for products for which a specific inter-laboratory test (test code) already exists, a smaller uncertainty can be used, and this may produce an unbalanced situation on the market.
2018
Proceedings of the 25th International Congress on Sound and Vibration
1
8
Garai M.; Scrosati C.; Pievatolo A.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/637319
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact