The present editorial draws a reflection on the intersections and overlaps of notions and interpretations of the concept of scientific assignment, open data and open science in Criminal Procedure. Based on the premise that the public disclosure of data and statistics in open access represents both a guarantee regarding the quality and seriousness of the information, and an economy of time and resources for scientific research, this editorial is focused on the criteria for willingness of the scientific community to validate the research.
CAPPARELLI, B., GIACOMOLLI, N. (2018). Editorial: Instruments and practices for Open Science in Criminal Procedure – perplexities and some possibilities. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL, 4(1), 25-40 [10.22197/rbdpp.v4i1.137].
Editorial: Instruments and practices for Open Science in Criminal Procedure – perplexities and some possibilities
CAPPARELLI, B;
2018
Abstract
The present editorial draws a reflection on the intersections and overlaps of notions and interpretations of the concept of scientific assignment, open data and open science in Criminal Procedure. Based on the premise that the public disclosure of data and statistics in open access represents both a guarantee regarding the quality and seriousness of the information, and an economy of time and resources for scientific research, this editorial is focused on the criteria for willingness of the scientific community to validate the research.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
137-588-1-PB.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione
309.26 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
309.26 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
