Background: Ragweed pollen represents a major allergy risk factor. Ragweed extracts contain five different isoforms of the major allergen Amb a 1. However, the immunological characteristics of Amb a 1 isoforms are not fully investigated. Here, we compared the physicochemical and immunological properties of three most important Amb a 1 isoforms. Methods: After purification, the isoforms were physicochemically characterized, tested for antibody binding and induction of human T-cell proliferative responses. Their immunological properties were further evaluated in vitro and in vivo in a mouse model. Results: Amb a 1 isoforms exhibited distinct patterns of IgE binding and immunogenicity. Compared to Amb a 1.02 or 03 isoforms, Amb a 1.01 showed higher IgE-binding activity. Isoforms 01 and 03 were the most potent stimulators of patients’ T cells. In a mouse model of immunization, Amb a 1.01 induced higher levels of IgG and IgE antibodies when compared to isoforms 02 and 03. Interestingly, ragweed-sensitized patients also displayed an IgG response to Amb a 1 isoforms. However, unlike therapy-induced antibodies, sensitization-induced IgG did not show IgE-blocking activity. Conclusion: The present study showed that naturally occurring isoforms of Amb a 1 possess different immunogenic and sensitizing properties. These findings should be considered when selecting sequences for molecule-based diagnosis and therapy for ragweed allergy. Due to its high IgE-binding activity, isoform Amb a 1.01 should be included in diagnostic tests. In contrast, due to their limited B- and T-cell cross-reactivity patterns, a combination of different isoforms might be a more attractive strategy for ragweed immunotherapy.

Amb a 1 isoforms: Unequal siblings with distinct immunological features / Wolf, M.; Twaroch, T.E.; Huber, S.; Reithofer, M.; Steiner, M.; Aglas, L.; Hauser, M.; Aloisi, I.; Asam, C.; Hofer, H.; Parigiani, M.A.; Ebner, C.; Bohle, B.; Briza, P.; Neubauer, A.; Stolz, F.; Jahn-Schmid, B.; Wallner, M.; Ferreira, F.*. - In: ALLERGY. - ISSN 0105-4538. - ELETTRONICO. - 72:12(2017), pp. 1874-1882. [10.1111/all.13196]

Amb a 1 isoforms: Unequal siblings with distinct immunological features

Aloisi, I.;
2017

Abstract

Background: Ragweed pollen represents a major allergy risk factor. Ragweed extracts contain five different isoforms of the major allergen Amb a 1. However, the immunological characteristics of Amb a 1 isoforms are not fully investigated. Here, we compared the physicochemical and immunological properties of three most important Amb a 1 isoforms. Methods: After purification, the isoforms were physicochemically characterized, tested for antibody binding and induction of human T-cell proliferative responses. Their immunological properties were further evaluated in vitro and in vivo in a mouse model. Results: Amb a 1 isoforms exhibited distinct patterns of IgE binding and immunogenicity. Compared to Amb a 1.02 or 03 isoforms, Amb a 1.01 showed higher IgE-binding activity. Isoforms 01 and 03 were the most potent stimulators of patients’ T cells. In a mouse model of immunization, Amb a 1.01 induced higher levels of IgG and IgE antibodies when compared to isoforms 02 and 03. Interestingly, ragweed-sensitized patients also displayed an IgG response to Amb a 1 isoforms. However, unlike therapy-induced antibodies, sensitization-induced IgG did not show IgE-blocking activity. Conclusion: The present study showed that naturally occurring isoforms of Amb a 1 possess different immunogenic and sensitizing properties. These findings should be considered when selecting sequences for molecule-based diagnosis and therapy for ragweed allergy. Due to its high IgE-binding activity, isoform Amb a 1.01 should be included in diagnostic tests. In contrast, due to their limited B- and T-cell cross-reactivity patterns, a combination of different isoforms might be a more attractive strategy for ragweed immunotherapy.
2017
Amb a 1 isoforms: Unequal siblings with distinct immunological features / Wolf, M.; Twaroch, T.E.; Huber, S.; Reithofer, M.; Steiner, M.; Aglas, L.; Hauser, M.; Aloisi, I.; Asam, C.; Hofer, H.; Parigiani, M.A.; Ebner, C.; Bohle, B.; Briza, P.; Neubauer, A.; Stolz, F.; Jahn-Schmid, B.; Wallner, M.; Ferreira, F.*. - In: ALLERGY. - ISSN 0105-4538. - ELETTRONICO. - 72:12(2017), pp. 1874-1882. [10.1111/all.13196]
Wolf, M.; Twaroch, T.E.; Huber, S.; Reithofer, M.; Steiner, M.; Aglas, L.; Hauser, M.; Aloisi, I.; Asam, C.; Hofer, H.; Parigiani, M.A.; Ebner, C.; Bohle, B.; Briza, P.; Neubauer, A.; Stolz, F.; Jahn-Schmid, B.; Wallner, M.; Ferreira, F.*
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/630714
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact