Purpose: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains the most commonly used tool as mechanical circulatory support in children. We report our experience on pediatric veno-arterial (v-a) ECMO support as treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods: Between October 2004 and August 2015, 54 consecutive pediat- ric patients (31 male; age: 3.5±5.1 years, range: 1-17 years; mean weight: 14.3±11.1 kg, range: 2.8-60.5 kg) were supported on Levitronix CentriMag (n=41) and RotaFlow (n=13) v-a ECMO, at our institution. Indications for support were: failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass in the setting of postcardiotomy (n=35) and early donor graft failure (n=4); primary CS on congenital heart defect (n=4); acute myocarditis (n=3); and CS on chronic heart failure (n=8). Results: A central setting was established in 43 (79.6%) patients while peripherally in 11 (20.4%). Overall mean support time was 11.9±9.7 days (range: 1-43 days). Thirty-one (57.4%) patients died on ECMO mostly due to multiple organ dysfunction and sepsis. Overall success rate, in terms of survival on ECMO (n=23), weaning from mechanical support (n=13, 24.1%), bridge to heart transplantation (n=7, 12.9%) and bridge to long-term Berlin Heart Excor ventricular assist device (n=3, 5.5%), was 42.6%. Only fourteen (25.9%) patients were discharged since significant myocardial dys- function persisted or pulmonary hypertensive events occurred after weaning from ECMO. Multivariate analysis identified cardio-pulmonary resuscita- tion before ECMO, congenital heart defect, post-cardiotomy CS, and time on mechanical support as significant (p<0.001) predictors of mortality on ECMO. After adjusting per cohort of patients, univentricular physiology resulted to be a factor significantly (p<0.001) associated with an increased risk of mortality. Conclusion: Based on our preliminary results, ECMO has the advantage of being cost-effective and rapidly applicable over a wide range of ages, weights thus providing biventricular cardiovascular and pulmonary support. Overall mortality during circulatory support remains high but probably an early ECMO installation could be beneficial to improve outcomes particularly after surgical repair. Single ventricle palliations with shunt-dependent pulmonary blood flow need to be accurately monitored and managed while on ECMO.

Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support as Treatment for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock / Loforte, A; Murana, G; Sposito, M; Careddu, L; Petridis, E; Angeli, E; Ragni, L; Frascaroli, G; Gargiulo, G. - In: THE JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 1053-2498. - ELETTRONICO. - 35:4(2016), pp. S350-S350.

Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support as Treatment for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

Loforte, A
Conceptualization
;
Murana, G
Conceptualization
;
Careddu, L
Methodology
;
Gargiulo, G
Supervision
2016

Abstract

Purpose: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains the most commonly used tool as mechanical circulatory support in children. We report our experience on pediatric veno-arterial (v-a) ECMO support as treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods: Between October 2004 and August 2015, 54 consecutive pediat- ric patients (31 male; age: 3.5±5.1 years, range: 1-17 years; mean weight: 14.3±11.1 kg, range: 2.8-60.5 kg) were supported on Levitronix CentriMag (n=41) and RotaFlow (n=13) v-a ECMO, at our institution. Indications for support were: failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass in the setting of postcardiotomy (n=35) and early donor graft failure (n=4); primary CS on congenital heart defect (n=4); acute myocarditis (n=3); and CS on chronic heart failure (n=8). Results: A central setting was established in 43 (79.6%) patients while peripherally in 11 (20.4%). Overall mean support time was 11.9±9.7 days (range: 1-43 days). Thirty-one (57.4%) patients died on ECMO mostly due to multiple organ dysfunction and sepsis. Overall success rate, in terms of survival on ECMO (n=23), weaning from mechanical support (n=13, 24.1%), bridge to heart transplantation (n=7, 12.9%) and bridge to long-term Berlin Heart Excor ventricular assist device (n=3, 5.5%), was 42.6%. Only fourteen (25.9%) patients were discharged since significant myocardial dys- function persisted or pulmonary hypertensive events occurred after weaning from ECMO. Multivariate analysis identified cardio-pulmonary resuscita- tion before ECMO, congenital heart defect, post-cardiotomy CS, and time on mechanical support as significant (p<0.001) predictors of mortality on ECMO. After adjusting per cohort of patients, univentricular physiology resulted to be a factor significantly (p<0.001) associated with an increased risk of mortality. Conclusion: Based on our preliminary results, ECMO has the advantage of being cost-effective and rapidly applicable over a wide range of ages, weights thus providing biventricular cardiovascular and pulmonary support. Overall mortality during circulatory support remains high but probably an early ECMO installation could be beneficial to improve outcomes particularly after surgical repair. Single ventricle palliations with shunt-dependent pulmonary blood flow need to be accurately monitored and managed while on ECMO.
2016
Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support as Treatment for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock / Loforte, A; Murana, G; Sposito, M; Careddu, L; Petridis, E; Angeli, E; Ragni, L; Frascaroli, G; Gargiulo, G. - In: THE JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 1053-2498. - ELETTRONICO. - 35:4(2016), pp. S350-S350.
Loforte, A; Murana, G; Sposito, M; Careddu, L; Petridis, E; Angeli, E; Ragni, L; Frascaroli, G; Gargiulo, G
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/629386
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact