Background Treatment of patients with coexisting spondyloarthritis (SpA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often requires multidisciplinary collaboration between gastroenterologists and rheumatologists. Aim To describe the results of the first Delphi consensus to define shared therapeutic strategies for the best management of patients with coexisting SpA and IBD. Methods A scientific steering committee of 10 Italian experts in the field of SpA and IBD developed 27 statements on 5 possible clinical scenarios and selected 40 specialists from across Italy, both gastroenterologists and rheumatologists, to vote them using a Delphi method. Each participant expressed a level of agreement on each statement using a 5-point scale (1 = “absolutely disagree” 5 = “absolutely agree”). Total cumulative agreement was defined as the sum of the percentage of responses to items 4 (“agree”) and 5 (“absolutely agree”). Total cumulative agreement ≥70% defined consensus for each statement. Results After the first round, positive consensus was reached for 22 statements. Statements without consensus were discussed in a plenary session before the second vote. Positive consensus was then reached in all statements, with final total cumulative agreement ranging from 80% to 100%. Conclusion This is the first Delphi consensus defining specific treatment algorithms for patients with coexisting SpA and IBD.

Armuzzi, A., Felice, C., Lubrano, E., Cantini, F., Castiglione, F., Gionchetti, P., et al. (2017). Multidisciplinary management of patients with coexisting inflammatory bowel disease and spondyloarthritis: A Delphi consensus among Italian experts. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 49(12), 1298-1305 [10.1016/j.dld.2017.06.004].

Multidisciplinary management of patients with coexisting inflammatory bowel disease and spondyloarthritis: A Delphi consensus among Italian experts

Gionchetti, Paolo;SALVARANI, CARLO;OLIVIERI, IGNAZIO
2017

Abstract

Background Treatment of patients with coexisting spondyloarthritis (SpA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often requires multidisciplinary collaboration between gastroenterologists and rheumatologists. Aim To describe the results of the first Delphi consensus to define shared therapeutic strategies for the best management of patients with coexisting SpA and IBD. Methods A scientific steering committee of 10 Italian experts in the field of SpA and IBD developed 27 statements on 5 possible clinical scenarios and selected 40 specialists from across Italy, both gastroenterologists and rheumatologists, to vote them using a Delphi method. Each participant expressed a level of agreement on each statement using a 5-point scale (1 = “absolutely disagree” 5 = “absolutely agree”). Total cumulative agreement was defined as the sum of the percentage of responses to items 4 (“agree”) and 5 (“absolutely agree”). Total cumulative agreement ≥70% defined consensus for each statement. Results After the first round, positive consensus was reached for 22 statements. Statements without consensus were discussed in a plenary session before the second vote. Positive consensus was then reached in all statements, with final total cumulative agreement ranging from 80% to 100%. Conclusion This is the first Delphi consensus defining specific treatment algorithms for patients with coexisting SpA and IBD.
2017
Armuzzi, A., Felice, C., Lubrano, E., Cantini, F., Castiglione, F., Gionchetti, P., et al. (2017). Multidisciplinary management of patients with coexisting inflammatory bowel disease and spondyloarthritis: A Delphi consensus among Italian experts. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 49(12), 1298-1305 [10.1016/j.dld.2017.06.004].
Armuzzi, Alessandro*; Felice, Carla; Lubrano, Ennio; Cantini, Fabrizio; Castiglione, Fabiana; Gionchetti, Paolo; Orlando, Ambrogio; Salvarani, Carlo; ...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/627411
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact