Introduction: Oral contraceptives could induce mood changes. As far as our knowledge, there are no studies in literature that have examined the role of vaginal contraception in selfperceived body image. Aim: To evaluate the effects of intravaginal contraception on weight gain and perceived body image in relation with the Beck’s Depression Inventory questionnaire (BDI) and the McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ). Methods: Twenty-one adult (18–35 years old) eumenorrheic (menstrual cycle of 25–35 days), lean (body mass index – BMI – of 19–25 kg/m2) women who were referred for hormonal contraception were administered the Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (FRS), BDI and MFSQ. Subjects were studied in basal condition and after 6 months of therapy with vaginal contraception (NuvaRing; Organon-Schering-Plough Italia, Milan, Italy). Main outcome measures: BMI, FRS, MFSQ and BDI. Results: After 6 months of therapy with NuvaRing, both body weight (60.0 ± 8.3; p¼0.050) and BMI (22.1 ± 3.1; p¼0.028) slightly, but statistically, increased. FRS and BDI showed no differences after the vaginal contraception. Hormonal contraception was associated with a significant decrease in the two-factor Italian MFSQ score. Conclusions: Vaginal ring seems a good alternative to other hormonal contraceptive not significantly altering the female sexuality and not influencing the FRS and BDI.

Weight gain, body image and sexual function in young patients treated with contraceptive vaginal ring. A prospective pilot study / Morotti E, Casadio P, Guasina F, Battaglia B, Mattioli M, Battaglia C.. - In: GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY. - ISSN 0951-3590. - ELETTRONICO. - 33:8(2017), pp. 660-664. [10.1080/09513590.2017.1306850]

Weight gain, body image and sexual function in young patients treated with contraceptive vaginal ring. A prospective pilot study.

Morotti E;Casadio P;Guasina F;Battaglia C.
2017

Abstract

Introduction: Oral contraceptives could induce mood changes. As far as our knowledge, there are no studies in literature that have examined the role of vaginal contraception in selfperceived body image. Aim: To evaluate the effects of intravaginal contraception on weight gain and perceived body image in relation with the Beck’s Depression Inventory questionnaire (BDI) and the McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ). Methods: Twenty-one adult (18–35 years old) eumenorrheic (menstrual cycle of 25–35 days), lean (body mass index – BMI – of 19–25 kg/m2) women who were referred for hormonal contraception were administered the Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (FRS), BDI and MFSQ. Subjects were studied in basal condition and after 6 months of therapy with vaginal contraception (NuvaRing; Organon-Schering-Plough Italia, Milan, Italy). Main outcome measures: BMI, FRS, MFSQ and BDI. Results: After 6 months of therapy with NuvaRing, both body weight (60.0 ± 8.3; p¼0.050) and BMI (22.1 ± 3.1; p¼0.028) slightly, but statistically, increased. FRS and BDI showed no differences after the vaginal contraception. Hormonal contraception was associated with a significant decrease in the two-factor Italian MFSQ score. Conclusions: Vaginal ring seems a good alternative to other hormonal contraceptive not significantly altering the female sexuality and not influencing the FRS and BDI.
2017
Weight gain, body image and sexual function in young patients treated with contraceptive vaginal ring. A prospective pilot study / Morotti E, Casadio P, Guasina F, Battaglia B, Mattioli M, Battaglia C.. - In: GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY. - ISSN 0951-3590. - ELETTRONICO. - 33:8(2017), pp. 660-664. [10.1080/09513590.2017.1306850]
Morotti E, Casadio P, Guasina F, Battaglia B, Mattioli M, Battaglia C.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/622313
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact