The interpretation of a norm is often uncertain and conflicting. In this paper we propose a model for arguing about legal interpretation, which considers the problems of vagueness. After motivating our adoption of graded categories as a tool to tackle the problem of open texture in legal interpretation, we introduce a model based on fuzzy logic and argumentation. Then, we conduct a case study by using an example from medically assisted reproduction.
da Costa Pereira, C., Tettamanzi, A.G.B., Liao, B., Malerba, A., Rotolo, A., van der Torre, L. (2017). Combining fuzzy logic and formal argumentation for legal interpretation. New York : ACM [10.1145/3086512.3086532].
Combining fuzzy logic and formal argumentation for legal interpretation
Malerba, Alessandra;Rotolo, Antonino;
2017
Abstract
The interpretation of a norm is often uncertain and conflicting. In this paper we propose a model for arguing about legal interpretation, which considers the problems of vagueness. After motivating our adoption of graded categories as a tool to tackle the problem of open texture in legal interpretation, we introduce a model based on fuzzy logic and argumentation. Then, we conduct a case study by using an example from medically assisted reproduction.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
POST_PRINT_ACM_con disclaimer_Combining__Fuzzy_Logic_and_Formal_Argumentation.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Postprint
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
963.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
963.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.