Fetal malpositions and cephalic malpresentations are well-recognized causes of failure to progress in labor. They frequently require operative delivery, and are associated with an increased probability of fetal and maternal complications. Traditional obstetrics emphasizes the role of digital examinations, but recent studies demonstrated that this approach is inaccurate and intrapartum ultrasound is far more precise. The objective of this review is to summarize the current body of literature and provide recommendations to identify malpositions and cephalic malpresentations with ultrasound. We propose a systematic approach consisting of a combination of transabdominal and transperineal scans and describe the findings that allow an accurate diagnosis of normal and abnormal position, flexion, and synclitism of the fetal head. The management of malpositions and cephalic malpresentation is currently a matter of debate, and individualized depending on the general clinical picture and expertise of the provider. Intrapartum sonography allows a precise diagnosis and therefore offers the best opportunity to design prospective studies with the aim of establishing evidence-based treatment. The article is accompanied by a that demonstrates the sonographic technique and findings.

Bellussi, F., Ghi, T., Youssef, A., Salsi, G., Giorgetta, F., Parma, D., et al. (2017). The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 217(6), 633-641-641 [10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.025].

The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations

Bellussi, Federica
Investigation
;
Ghi, Tullio
Supervision
;
Youssef, Aly
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Salsi, Ginevra
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Giorgetta, Francesca
Investigation
;
Parma, Dila
Conceptualization
;
Simonazzi, Giuliana
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Pilu, Gianluigi
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2017

Abstract

Fetal malpositions and cephalic malpresentations are well-recognized causes of failure to progress in labor. They frequently require operative delivery, and are associated with an increased probability of fetal and maternal complications. Traditional obstetrics emphasizes the role of digital examinations, but recent studies demonstrated that this approach is inaccurate and intrapartum ultrasound is far more precise. The objective of this review is to summarize the current body of literature and provide recommendations to identify malpositions and cephalic malpresentations with ultrasound. We propose a systematic approach consisting of a combination of transabdominal and transperineal scans and describe the findings that allow an accurate diagnosis of normal and abnormal position, flexion, and synclitism of the fetal head. The management of malpositions and cephalic malpresentation is currently a matter of debate, and individualized depending on the general clinical picture and expertise of the provider. Intrapartum sonography allows a precise diagnosis and therefore offers the best opportunity to design prospective studies with the aim of establishing evidence-based treatment. The article is accompanied by a that demonstrates the sonographic technique and findings.
2017
Bellussi, F., Ghi, T., Youssef, A., Salsi, G., Giorgetta, F., Parma, D., et al. (2017). The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 217(6), 633-641-641 [10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.025].
Bellussi, Federica; Ghi, Tullio; Youssef, Aly; Salsi, Ginevra; Giorgetta, Francesca; Parma, Dila; Simonazzi, Giuliana; Pilu, Gianluigi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/621131
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 76
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact