Is cultural diversity an ethnographic invention, or cultures are real objects, to observe, to represent and to study? In this paper it is my intention to underline that anthropological reflection on culture has taken a dead end since the beginning of ethnographic research, for a great amount of efforts was spent to represent the content of specific cultures, expressed by a plurality of single societies. The final result is that nowadays anthropologists know much about invented (maybe) cultures, but do not know a lot about Culture, about how Culture works, which is, otherwise, in my opinion, the main aim of anthropological research. Cultural anthropology is lacking of a culture theory, and this is a bit embarrassing for more than one reason. It is true that in the last years the crisis of representation in social science has been overcame in part by new theoretical categories, and by new ways to think the concept of culture, no more as an essence, strongly linked to a place, to a delimited “spot”, but as a dynamic process a flux, which creates meanings. But the necessary step for anthropological way to think culture will better fit with the actual world is maybe to deal with “the other term”, the term “Nature”, always present but always neglected within anthropological research about men in culture.

Affianco alla cultura: "l'altro termine" / Matera V. - In: RASSEGNA ITALIANA DI SOCIOLOGIA. - ISSN 0486-0349. - STAMPA. - 1(2004), pp. 63-78.

Affianco alla cultura: "l'altro termine"

MATERA, VINCENZO
2004

Abstract

Is cultural diversity an ethnographic invention, or cultures are real objects, to observe, to represent and to study? In this paper it is my intention to underline that anthropological reflection on culture has taken a dead end since the beginning of ethnographic research, for a great amount of efforts was spent to represent the content of specific cultures, expressed by a plurality of single societies. The final result is that nowadays anthropologists know much about invented (maybe) cultures, but do not know a lot about Culture, about how Culture works, which is, otherwise, in my opinion, the main aim of anthropological research. Cultural anthropology is lacking of a culture theory, and this is a bit embarrassing for more than one reason. It is true that in the last years the crisis of representation in social science has been overcame in part by new theoretical categories, and by new ways to think the concept of culture, no more as an essence, strongly linked to a place, to a delimited “spot”, but as a dynamic process a flux, which creates meanings. But the necessary step for anthropological way to think culture will better fit with the actual world is maybe to deal with “the other term”, the term “Nature”, always present but always neglected within anthropological research about men in culture.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/619997
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact