Main surgical approaches to the hip have been modified during last decades, in an effort to reduce invasiveness of the surgical procedure and allow a faster rehabilitation. Direct anterior approach is the only approach, which does not require muscle detachment, thus theoretically leading to reduced post-operative pain and allows earlier recovery. The aim of this study was to report a comparison between patients operated with direct anterior approach and postero-lateral approach in terms of immediate post-operative and in-hospital records. Pain, operative time, intra- and post-operative complications, blood loss, hospitalization, motor component of the Functional Independence Measure (M-FIM), timed up and go (TUG) test were measured between the two groups and compared. Direct anterior approach showed better results in M-FIM, TUG, hospitalization and blood loss, without any significant difference for intra- and post-operative complications between the 2 groups. This study shows that early post-operative recovery is influenced by the chosen approach. Direct anterior approach showed better outcomes when compared to postero-lateral approach, limited to hospitalization, blood loss, and functional scores. Further comparisons are needed to evaluate direct anterior approach to maintain advantages over postero-lateral approach on longer follow-up period.

Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: effects on early post-operative rehabilitation period

Faldini, C;Perna, F;Mazzotti, A;Stefanini, N;Panciera, A;Geraci, G;Mora, P;Traina, F
2017

Abstract

Main surgical approaches to the hip have been modified during last decades, in an effort to reduce invasiveness of the surgical procedure and allow a faster rehabilitation. Direct anterior approach is the only approach, which does not require muscle detachment, thus theoretically leading to reduced post-operative pain and allows earlier recovery. The aim of this study was to report a comparison between patients operated with direct anterior approach and postero-lateral approach in terms of immediate post-operative and in-hospital records. Pain, operative time, intra- and post-operative complications, blood loss, hospitalization, motor component of the Functional Independence Measure (M-FIM), timed up and go (TUG) test were measured between the two groups and compared. Direct anterior approach showed better results in M-FIM, TUG, hospitalization and blood loss, without any significant difference for intra- and post-operative complications between the 2 groups. This study shows that early post-operative recovery is influenced by the chosen approach. Direct anterior approach showed better outcomes when compared to postero-lateral approach, limited to hospitalization, blood loss, and functional scores. Further comparisons are needed to evaluate direct anterior approach to maintain advantages over postero-lateral approach on longer follow-up period.
Faldini, C; Perna, F; Mazzotti, A; Stefanini, N; Panciera, A; Geraci, G; Mora, P; Traina, F
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/619527
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact