Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an important and promising therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Optimization of patient selection and the availability of an accurate anatomical guide could improve RFA success rate. In this study we propose a unified, fully automated approach to build a 3D patient-specific left atrium (LA) model including pulmonary veins (PVs) in order to provide an accurate anatomical guide during RFA and without PVs in order to characterize LA volumetry and support patient selection for AF ablation. Methods Magnetic resonance data from twenty-six patients referred for AF RFA were processed applying an edge-based level set approach guided by a phaseâbased edge detector to obtain the 3D LA model with PVs. An automated technique based on the shape diameter function was designed and applied to remove PVs and compute LA volume. 3D LA models were qualitatively compared with 3D LA surfaces acquired during the ablation procedure. An expert radiologist manually traced the LA on MR images twice. LA surfaces from the automatic approach and manual tracing were compared by mean surface-to-surface distance. In addition, LA volumes were compared with volumes from manual segmentation by linear and Bland-Altman analyses. Results Qualitative comparison of 3D LA models showed several inaccuracies, in particular PVs reconstruction was not accurate and left atrial appendage was missing in the model obtained during RFA procedure. LA surfaces were very similar (mean surface-to-surface distance: 2.3 ± 0.7 mm). LA volumes were in excellent agreement (y = 1.03x â 1.4, r = 0.99, bias = â 1.37 ml (â 1.43%) SD = 2.16 ml (2.3%), mean percentage difference = 1.3% ± 2.1%). Conclusions Results showed the proposed 3D patient-specific LA model with PVs is able to better describe LA anatomy compared to models derived from the navigation system, thus potentially improving electrograms and voltage information location and reducing fluoroscopic time during RFA. Quantitative assessment of LA volume derived from our 3D LA model without PVs is also accurate and may provide important information for patient selection for RFA.
Valinoti, M., Fabbri, C., Turco, D., Mantovan, R., Pasini, A., Corsi, C. (2018). 3D patient-specific models for left atrium characterization to support ablation in atrial fibrillation patients. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 45, 51-57 [10.1016/j.mri.2017.09.012].
3D patient-specific models for left atrium characterization to support ablation in atrial fibrillation patients
Valinoti, Maddalena;Fabbri, Claudio;Turco, Dario;Corsi, Cristiana
2018
Abstract
Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an important and promising therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Optimization of patient selection and the availability of an accurate anatomical guide could improve RFA success rate. In this study we propose a unified, fully automated approach to build a 3D patient-specific left atrium (LA) model including pulmonary veins (PVs) in order to provide an accurate anatomical guide during RFA and without PVs in order to characterize LA volumetry and support patient selection for AF ablation. Methods Magnetic resonance data from twenty-six patients referred for AF RFA were processed applying an edge-based level set approach guided by a phaseâbased edge detector to obtain the 3D LA model with PVs. An automated technique based on the shape diameter function was designed and applied to remove PVs and compute LA volume. 3D LA models were qualitatively compared with 3D LA surfaces acquired during the ablation procedure. An expert radiologist manually traced the LA on MR images twice. LA surfaces from the automatic approach and manual tracing were compared by mean surface-to-surface distance. In addition, LA volumes were compared with volumes from manual segmentation by linear and Bland-Altman analyses. Results Qualitative comparison of 3D LA models showed several inaccuracies, in particular PVs reconstruction was not accurate and left atrial appendage was missing in the model obtained during RFA procedure. LA surfaces were very similar (mean surface-to-surface distance: 2.3 ± 0.7 mm). LA volumes were in excellent agreement (y = 1.03x â 1.4, r = 0.99, bias = â 1.37 ml (â 1.43%) SD = 2.16 ml (2.3%), mean percentage difference = 1.3% ± 2.1%). Conclusions Results showed the proposed 3D patient-specific LA model with PVs is able to better describe LA anatomy compared to models derived from the navigation system, thus potentially improving electrograms and voltage information location and reducing fluoroscopic time during RFA. Quantitative assessment of LA volume derived from our 3D LA model without PVs is also accurate and may provide important information for patient selection for RFA.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.