In this paper, the AC interference produced by an overhead power transmission line on a buried metallic pipeline is estimated using a circuital method based on the well-known Carsonâ s formulae and a two-dimensional finite element numerical code. The finite element formulation used in this paper implicitly takes into account the mutual inductive coupling between all the considered conductors, and it allows a more detailed analysis in cases where a nonhomogeneous soil is present. The FEM approach includes a procedure which has been developed to enforce that the sum of the currents flowing through the soil, pipeline and eventual overhead ground wire is equal to zero. A case study has been identified, and the results obtained by the two approaches have been compared and discussed.
Cristofolini, A., Popoli, A., Sandrolini, L. (2017). A comparison between Carsonâ s formulae and a 2D FEM approach for the evaluation of AC interference caused by overhead power lines on buried metallic pipelines. PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH C, 79, 39-48 [10.2528/PIERC17080501].
A comparison between Carsonâ s formulae and a 2D FEM approach for the evaluation of AC interference caused by overhead power lines on buried metallic pipelines
Cristofolini, Andrea
;Popoli, Arturo;Sandrolini, Leonardo
2017
Abstract
In this paper, the AC interference produced by an overhead power transmission line on a buried metallic pipeline is estimated using a circuital method based on the well-known Carsonâ s formulae and a two-dimensional finite element numerical code. The finite element formulation used in this paper implicitly takes into account the mutual inductive coupling between all the considered conductors, and it allows a more detailed analysis in cases where a nonhomogeneous soil is present. The FEM approach includes a procedure which has been developed to enforce that the sum of the currents flowing through the soil, pipeline and eventual overhead ground wire is equal to zero. A case study has been identified, and the results obtained by the two approaches have been compared and discussed.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
17080501.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: VoR
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.2 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.2 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


